Donate

Ticks in the Bay Area Can Carry Lyme Disease – and That’s Not All

, KQED Science | February 18, 2014 | 2 Comments
  • Share:
  • Facebook
  • Pinterest
  • Reddit
  • Email
Western black-legged ticks can carry the bacteria that cause Lyme disease and other pathogens. (Ervic Aquino/Stanford)

Western black-legged ticks can carry pathogens including the bacteria that cause Lyme Disease. (Ervic Aquino/Stanford)

Contrary to a common misconception, ticks in the Bay Area can carry the bacteria that causes Lyme Disease. And it turns out local ticks carry another disease that can make you sick, too.

A bacteria called Borrelia burgdorferi causes Lyme disease. It’s more common in the Midwest and the Northeast where, in some places, more than 30 percent of ticks carry it. In the Bay Area, it’s closer to two percent, according to a new study. And the study, published in the journal Emerging Infectious Disease by Stanford researcher Dan Salkeld, turned up another bacteria just as often: Borrelia miyamotoi, which causes similar symptoms.

“That was the big surprise for us,” said Salkeld. “I think there were a couple studies that found miyamotoi in California before — one in Tilden Park and one up in Mendocino County — but we were quite surprised by how frequently you could find it.”

Salkeld collected and tested ticks from 18 parks around the Bay Area. The collection was decidedly low-tech: Salkeld, with help from Stanford students and local volunteers, dragged blankets around and let the ticks hop on board.

There are no known cases of the disease caused by miyamotoi in California, according to Salkeld, but, he said, that may be because doctors haven’t known to look for it.

“(It’s) a big cause for humility that we don’t always know what’s in the backyard,” he said. Miyamotoi was just diagnosed as a human pathogen in the U.S. last year. “Although ticks are disgusting in almost every way, it is quite amazing to realize that we’re just looking at the tip of an iceberg in terms of what we know about pathogens in wildlife.”

Related

Explore: , , , ,

Category: Health, News

  • Share:
  • Facebook
  • Pinterest
  • Reddit
  • Email

About the Author ()

Molly Samuel joined KQED as an intern in 2007, and since then has worked here as a reporter, producer, director and blogger. Before becoming KQED Science’s Multimedia Producer, she was a producer for Climate Watch. Molly has also reported for NPR, KALW and High Country News, and has produced audio stories for The Encyclopedia of Life and the Oakland Museum of California. She was a fellow with the Middlebury Fellowships in Environmental Journalism and a journalist-in-residence at the National Evolutionary Synthesis Center. Molly has a degree in Ancient Greek from Oberlin College and is a co-founder of the record label True Panther Sounds.
  • Richard Leevey

    Good to know but no information about how to ID the various dangerous Ticks.

    • flipperfeet

      You are right, it would have been very helpful if Ms. Samuel had included the information that it was… “First identified in 1995 in ticks from Japan, and the bacteria have since been detected in two species of North American ticks, the black-legged or “deer” tick (Ixodes scapularis) and the western black-legged tick (Ixodes pacificus).” To Ms. Samuel’s or the webmaster’s credit there is a link to the CDC page embedded in the story. http://www.cdc.gov/ticks/miyamotoi.html