Donate

Rep. George Miller Has Harsh Words for Intelligence Committees

| January 24, 2014
  • Share:
  • Facebook
  • Pinterest
  • Reddit
  • Email
George Miller

Rep. George Miller had some critical words for the House and Senate intelligence committees during his visit to “Forum.”

Martinez Congressman George Miller, who announced last week he won’t seek re-election after 20 terms in office, appeared on KQED’s “Forum” on Thursday to reflect on his 40 years representing the East Bay. In an interview that covered everything from the Affordable Care Act to his No Child Left Behind legislation, it was his criticism of the House and Senate intelligence committees that stood out.

Miller’s harsh words for how the intelligence panels operate came in response to a listener who asked in part: “The recent Manning & Snowden leaks seem to show the same abuses enumerated in the Church Committee of the late ’70s. How can the next Rep. to sit in his seat restrain NSA spying, CIA secret killing, and wars based on lies like Iraq better than the last 30 years?”

And here’s Miller’s response:

“That’s a tough question, but I think that person better be real skeptical. I went in with the Watergate papers; Frank Church’s report on the Intelligence Committee that looks a lot like the report on the NSA; Michael Harrington, the congressman from Massachusetts, who was talking about spying and the rest of this, essentially probably had to leave Congress because of his public discussion of that.

When I voted for the amendment that sort of pulled the NSA up short in the House a couple months ago, that vote for me was more about the House intelligence and the Senate intelligence committees because I think those committees are set up not to have real oversight, but so the intelligence agencies can say that they come and they’ve talked to Congress: ‘We informed Congress.’ They informed them in such an opaque fashion that the members of the committee are (saying) to one another: ‘Did they tell us this? How do we find out? Where was this? Where was that?’

‘I think those committees are set up not to have real oversight, but so the intelligence agencies can say that they come and they’ve talked to Congress.’

And they’ll tell you, as they ask very pointed questions. Many times the answers are never forthcoming, weeks and months later. So I think that Congress, as representatives of the people — the people can’t do all of this  – they better rethink their intelligence committee oversight on these agencies, because they’re getting buffaloed on a daily basis by these agencies and passing the buck around.”

You can listen to the full interview below:

Related

Explore: , , , , , , , , ,

Category: Politics

  • Share:
  • Facebook
  • Pinterest
  • Reddit
  • Email

About the Author ()

Amanda Stupi is the Engagement Producer for KQED’s daily public affairs program Forum. In that role she turns the information shared during the hour-long call-in show into web-friendly content. Her writing has been featured throughout KQED.org, including on KQED Arts and News Fix as well as on MLB.com, Hyphen Magazine and the San Francisco Examiner. Her radio work has aired on The California Report and Talk of the Nation. Stupi runs the @KQEDForum Twitter account and Forum Facebook account. Her personal Twitter account is @FiftyCentHotdog. She believes that Hostess products get a bad rap and that cereal can save the world. Reach Amanda Stupi at astupi@kqed.org.
  • Art Persyko

    Congressman George Miller’s critique on Forum has implications for Senator Dianne Feinstein, who’s Chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee; and for everyone who depends on a living, breathing US Constitution. She has failed to fulfill the mission of the Senate Intelligence Committee, which was set up to watch out for and prevent governmental abuse of power (like the ones that occurred under the Nixon Administration) to be a watchdog on the US intelligence community. Instead, she’s become a cheerleader for preserving the NSA’s current unconstitutional mass surveillance; and for damaging the 4th Amendment to the Constitution. She needs to be held accountable to us for not providing proper oversight over the NSA which is her job on that committee; for not upholding her oath of office (to protect and defend the Constitution); and for not protecting our civil liberties. If you agree, please go to: https://shameonfeinstein.org and sign the “Shame on Feinstein” open letter.