Richmond Tibetan Community Celebrates New Year; Prays for Peace

Add your comment

An altar pays homage to the Dalai Lama.

Scarves are offered to the Dalai Lama as part of Tibetan New Year events. Photo: Chelsea Hopkins/KQED

By Chelsea Hawkins

In Richmond Wednesday, dozens of community members gathered to mark the Tibetan New Year, sharing tea and rice, making traditional scarf offerings to the Dalai Lama, and praying for peace.

The event, organized by the Tibetan Association of Northern California and the San Francisco Tibetan Youth Congress, acknowledged the tumultuous political situation in Tibet and honored self-immolators from the past year.

San Francisco Tibetan Youth Congress President, Tashi Wangden, said it's concerning that so many young people have turned to self-immolation in protest.

"For me, it's a clear indication they're not happy," he said. "The way the Chinese government is treating [people] in Tibet, the way they look at human rights, it's clearly backwards."

Wangden said it is difficult for people outside Tibet to comprehend self-immolation but that it's important to understand it is an act of resistance to Chinese oppression.

"No one will take suppression, people will stand up and speak about it," Wangden said. "This is their action."

Wangden said activism is at the core of the Tibetan Youth Congress.

"We keep the struggle, the Tibetan struggle alive," he said. "You know, being in exile, we become the voices of our brothers and sisters back in Tibet, where they don't have any voice."


For Major Climate-Change Scientist, Big Fallout From Leaked Documents

Add your comment

KQED's Climate Watch has been covering the fallout to a major climate-change scientist stemming from leaked think-tank documents. The scientist who has admitted deception in obtaining the documents from the Heartland Institute, an organization devoted to questioning human-caused global warming, is Peter Gleick of the Oakland-based Pacific Institute. Gleick wrote on The Huffington Post on Monday that by procuring the materials using someone else's name, he engaged in a "serious lapse of my own professional judgment and ethics."

Climate Watch's Molly Samuel reports:

Climate scientist Peter Gleick, who... admitted that he was the source of leaked documents from the Heartland Institute, has resigned from the American Geophysical Union’s Task Force on Scientific Ethics. Gleick was chair of the task force, which met for the first time last November. According to a press release from the AGU, Gleick resigned last Thursday — after the explosive documents appeared on various blogs but before his online admission as perpetrator.

He’s also stepped down from a position which he hadn’t yet officially begun with the National Center for Science Education, an organization that advocates for evolution and climate change education in schools. Gleick was scheduled to begin serving on its board this week, but tendered his resignation yesterday. Read full post

Continue reading »


Man Taken into Custody After Oakland Elementary School Evacuated

Add your comment

Oakland police took an armed suspect into custody this morning in Oakland's Maxwell Park neighborhood. During the search, police ordered the evacuation of nearby Maxwell Park International Academy as a precaution, Oakland schools spokesman Troy Flint said.

The suspect was taken into custody by 11:30 a.m., and the students began returning to class shortly after, police said.

From the Oakland Police Department:

Armed man taken into custody by OPD near or at 2800 block Monticello.

Man armed with shotgun in public taken into custody by OPD near or at 2800 block Monticello. Students at Maxwell Park Elementary were evacuated as precaution, but will be returning to class; currently at Maxwell Park. All students and residents are safe. Police presence will dissapate and normal operations will resume following a security check at a nearby residence.


Interview: San Jose Earthquakes' President on Concerns About New Soccer Stadium

Add your comment

The agenda for the San Jose Planning Commission meeting tonight includes the proposal for a soccer stadium put forward by the San Jose Earthquakes.  If this sounds familiar, it should; the Planning Commission approved the project in December of last year.  But members of the Newhall Neighborhood Association filed an appeal (pdf), and so the issue comes up again tonight.

The stadium would seat about 18,000 on a site very closem to Mineta International Airport. The neighbors’ appeal cites concerns about how future disputes would be handled, intense stadium lighting, and especially noise -- public address systems, music, post-game fireworks, and something soccer is known for around the world -- loud crowds.  Earthquakes' president Dave Kaval says the team is sensitive to those issues and especially to that bane of the 2010 World Cup, the vuvuzuela.

We feel that we have a plan that mitigates that, both in the way we’ve designed the stadium and the way we have restrictions on not bringing vuvuzuelas and some other kinds of noisemakers.  At our current stadium, Buck Shaw, we actually ban vuvuzuelas, air horns, whistles, things that can take away from the ambience of the venue. But we do allow some drums for specific supporters’ groups.

Kaval stressed that the Quakes respect the process that allows community input at this point.  But he said neighbors should keep the history of the area in mind.

Previously the site was used to build M-2 Bradley armored personnel carriers.  We did the demolition work on the old factory last year.  So if you consider what it was, a tank factory, and now it's going to be a professional sports venue, that's a pretty big change.  It’s gentrification of an area that had been blighted and unused, which is a real positive for the community.

I asked him what happens to the land if the Quakes don’t succeed in putting a stadium there.

The reality is maybe nothing would get built here.  Maybe it would just lie empty for a  long time.  We have the option to develop the whole property, so in the long term this would include the stadium on 14 acres, our practice facility, and four lighted and turfed public soccer fields.  And we have it zoned for a hotel and commercial real estate.  It’s going to be a great gateway into San Jose for all the people arriving at the airport.

Kaval came to the Earthquakes in the fall of 2010 after founding independent baseball’s California Golden League.  But soccer has always been a passion for him.

I’ve lived here since the early 1990’s.  I went to games when the team was the San Jose Clash, and to the earlier version of the Quakes before the team left for Houston.  The Earthquakes originally go back to 1974, when the team started playing in the North American Soccer League in San Jose.  It was the first pro sports team in Silicon Valley. For a lot of people who were here at the time, it really helped put the community on the map, and created a lot of camaraderie and civic pride. 

And Kaval thinks a new stadium that would belong to the Quakes, instead of the rented college facilities the team has had up to now, would bring a whole new fan base with it.

Similar to when the Sharks got here.  Who knew about hockey before we got a hockey team here?  And it’s been wildly successful.  Well, people already know about soccer.  It’s the perfect sport for this international, diverse community of the Silicon Valley.  People come here from Europe, Asia, Africa, Latin America, and for many of them their number one sport is soccer.

If the Planning Commission gives the green light, construction could start later this year and the Quakes could kick off by the end of 2013.  No city money is involved, says Kaval; the team is providing all the funding.  The Quakes share ownership with the Oakland A's, who might have a new San Jose stadium of their own if Major League Baseball allows them to move south.  Kaval says links between the two stadium proposals have been overblown.

We’re really run as our own entity.  This process is really a stand-alone process.  Since our ownership is basically the same as the A’s, any learning from this, best practices, and how to work with communities, can be helpful to them.  But they’re not linked in the way that some people might assume.  The financing is completely separate, and obviously it’s a different sport, different league, different location.

The hearing’s at San Jose City Hall at 6:30 PM and will be streamed online. We’ll have more on this story Thursday morning on KQED News.

Related...


Audio: Two From Bob Mould Live, And Songs From All The Noise Pop Performers

Add your comment

Bob Mould (Noise Pop)

Bob Mould was on KQED Radio's Forum program yesterday talking about Noise Pop, which is taking place at multiple venues in San Francisco through Feb 26, and performing a couple of acoustic numbers.

Audio: Bob Mould performs "If I Can't Change Your Mind"

Play audio:
Audio player needs Flash9+ (download) and JavaScript.

Audio: Bob Mould performs "Makes No Sense At All"

Play audio:
Audio player needs Flash9+ (download) and JavaScript.

You can listen to the entire conversation with Mould and the Flaming Lips' Wayne Coin here or below:

You can hear more Mould at the Noise Pop site. In fact, you can hear songs from all the performers, including...


A.M. Splash: BART Cop Won't Face Charges in Fatal Shooting; SJ Softens Pension Proposal

Add your comment
  • BART Cop Won't Face Charges for Fatal Shooting (Bay Citizen)

    BART police Officer James Crowell "acted lawfully" when he shot and killed a knife-wielding homeless man last July, according to a San Francisco District Attorney's office report made public by BART Tuesday. The seven-month-long investigation concluded that Crowell was acting in self-defense when he opened fire on Charles Hill on the Civic Center station platform July 3, 2011.

  • San Jose softens pension proposal (SJ Mercury News)

    San Jose officials Tuesday called for softening a proposed June ballot measure to trim city worker pensions while acknowledging they failed to reach a deal with employee unions to slow growing retirement costs, ensuring a tough election fight that could draw national interest. A divided City Council had approved a June ballot measure in December but held off sending it to the registrar of voters to allow for changes based on mediation talks with workers. City Manager Debra Figone said that unless the council votes to change or withdraw the ballot language, it will go to the registrar as it was approved in December.

  • America’s Cup still has “long way” to go (SF Examiner)

    America’s Cup officials expect The City to present a new waterfront development agreement today, but negotiators were reportedly far apart as of late Tuesday afternoon. “If we don’t agree, there are serious questions about the cup being held in San Francisco,” said Stephen Barclay, chief operating officer for the regatta.

  • Community colleges may get new budget cut (SF Chronicle)

    Unless the state's revenue picture changes dramatically in the next few months, California community colleges can expect a new $149 million punch in the gut this year, college leaders said Tuesday.

  • CSU to trade ad campaign for cheaper textbooks (SF Chronicle)

    An ad campaign for a certain textbook publisher will appear on California State University campuses this spring in the form of memos to faculty, notices in student newspapers, and posters at bookstore counters.

  • GOP Race Tightens in California (SF Chronicle)

    Long written off as too late to matter, California's Republican primary June 5 may turn out to matter a lot. A new Field Poll shows former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum just six points behind front-runner Mitt Romney, the former governor of Massachusetts.

  • Ratings agencies downgrade local redevelopment bonds (Santa Rosa Press Democrat)

    Bonds issued by California’s now-defunct redevelopment agencies have been downgraded or placed on a warning list. The move follows the state’s elimination of redevelopment agencies and legal requirements that the agencies continue to pay their outstanding debts.

  • Gleick hurt by ethics lapse over climate papers (SF Chronicle)

    ...Peter Gleick, a MacArthur Foundation fellow and co-founder and president of Oakland's Pacific Institute, admitted Monday that he had posed as someone else and obtained confidential internal papers from the Heartland Institute, a libertarian group that has questioned the reality of human-caused global warming.

  • Vallejo marijuana dispensary raided by feds, state and local officials (Vallejo Times- Herald)

    The operator of one of Vallejo's more prominent medical marijuana dispensaries was arrested Tuesday, following a raid on his home, business and associated properties by federal, state and local law enforcement agents. Matthew Shotwell, operator and founder of Greenwell Cooperative at 616 Marin St., was arrested during the joint operation, Vallejo Police Lt. Ken Weaver said.

  • Contra Costa libraries on overdrive trying to meet demands for e-books (Contra Costa Times)

    You can get the latest from John Lescroart or Debbie Macomber on your e-reader free from the Contra Costa Library, but you'll have to wait. On Tuesday, the waiting list for the digital version of Lescroart's "Damage" was 14 readers deep. The e-line for Macomber's "Sandpiper Way" was at 49. With checkout times of seven or 14 days, it could be summer before either book was delivered to your Kindle, iPad or other device.


Transformer Fire Knocks Out Power For Thousands in Mission

Add your comment

(Bay City News) San Francisco fire crews are on the scene of a pole and transformer fire that knocked out power to thousands of PG&E customers in San Francisco's Mission District, according to fire and utility officials.

According to fire officials, a pole and transformer were reported on fire at 3:44 a.m. at 25 Duboce Ave. on the northern edge of the Mission District.

Crews remained at the scene as of 5 a.m., according to a fire dispatcher.

Power went out for 2,388 customers at 3:53 a.m. in the northern Mission District, PG&E spokesman J.D. Guidi said.

As of 5:20 a.m. power had been restored to all but 387 customers. There was no estimate when those remaining customers would have power back, Guidi said.

Crews are working on a failed overhead transformer at Duboce Avenue and Stevenson Street, he said.

The transformer is on a pole, according to Guidi.


Analysis of Prop 8 En Banc Filing: Proponents Looking For Stronger Dissent to Take to SCOTUS

Add your comment
Prop 8

Protesters at a 2011 hearing on Prop 8. (Photo: Scott Shafer/KQED)

Proponents of Proposition 8, California's same-sex marriage ban, have asked the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals for an en banc review of a ruling by a three-judge panel upholding a lower court's striking down the law as unconstitutional.

An en banc panel is made up of 11 judges, chosen at random from the circuit.

Read the petition for an en banc panel here.

Earlier today, KQED's Scott Shafer talked to Hastings law professor Rory Little about the procedure for and the legal strategy behind asking for an en banc panel. Edited transcript

Scott Shafer

Explain the en banc process.

Rory Little

Normally the filing is styled as a petition for a rehearing or for a rehearing en banc. A rehearing by the original panel is not granted very often. It's possible that the original panel either determines that the petitioners have shown an obvious error, so we don't need to go en banc because we can correct it ourselves, or the panel will sometimes adjust their opinion trying to head off an en banc. They're not likely to consider granting a rehearing of their own, but you never know.

In a case like this, almost certainly the panel will refer it to the en banc court. It would then go to a judge who's called the en banc coordinator. That coordinator will send it out and say here's a petition for rehearing en banc – and they get a ton of these. But this one will get special attention.

A majority of active judges in the circuit needs to grant an en banc hearing. That's 13 votes, which is very hard to get in a circuit that has 7,000 – 8,000 appeals filed a year. They grant maybe 15-20 en bancs a year.

I think [Prop 8 proponents] are pretty disappointed with Judge Smith's dissent, which was not a ringing Scalia-like forceful "this is wrong." It was more like "we should be cautious, although there are a lot of good points here."
The Supreme Court has said more than once that the 9th circuit ought to use its en banc power to clear up problematic decisions before the cases get to us. Then there are other judges who believe that if a case is an outlier, it's the Supreme Court's job to clear it up, not the en banc court.

Here's the kind of case that's always granted en banc: a case in which different panels of the 9th circuit have reached opposite conclusions, meaning an intra-circuit conflict. This case is not going to have any intra-circuit conflicts associated with it. The other kind of case is an inter-circuit conflict, where the opinion of the panel conflicts with opinions from other circuits.

The Prop 8 backers will assert that the panel's opinion conflicts with Supreme Court authority. The other thing they'll say is this is a matter of exceptional importance, even though it's a California case, because it's a huge state and also because parts of the panel's opinion cannot be limited to California. For example, the panel's rejecting the pro-Prop 8 rationale for the law as not having a rational basis is not restricted to California. That rational basis analysis, you would think, applies to virtually any gay rights case.

There are judges on the circuit who believe that if there's an inter-circuit conflict, that's not a job for the en banc court, it's a job for the Supreme Court. But the Supreme Court, frankly, believes that 9th circuit panels generate more outlier decisions, and that a number of decisions every year are obviously incorrect. So they think these cases should be handled by the circuit en banc and not by the Supreme Court in a summary reversal. Every year a large number of summary reversals by the Supreme Court are from the 9th circuit. Continue reading »


Video: West Oakland Residents On How They Feel About Occupy Oakland

Comments (1)

Below is a video taken by Xan West, who reports from her neighborhood of West Oakland for KQED's ouRXperience, a blog on health issues written by community correspondents across California.

If you're going to occupy with the intentions of getting the attention of the one percent, occupying a poor place -- they don't care about that. The one percent doesn't live in downtown Oakland."

Because Occupy Oakland has so dominated the news, West stepped outside of her health beat and asked a handful of friends and acquaintances for reaction to the movement.

Her first question to all: Do you think people in West Oakland are involved in Occupy Oakland? West Oakland is roughly 50 percent African American; all seven interviewees are black and said they didn't think African Americans in general were involved in the movement. Their reflections and analysis on the reasons why are included in the video below. Some of the comments:

  • "The items on the agenda of the movement, a lot of the people in West Oakland aren't even concerned with. That's why they're not involved."
  • "Most of the people I know in West Oakland don't see the relevance of the movement. I think they see it as, fortunately or unfortunately, trust fund babies, people who don't have to work, people who are already provisioned in this society. In some ways, it's like good for them they can do that, but I can't."
  • "The majority of the people I've seen with this Occupy movement are just like people jumping to the new social networking site... It's just the thing to do all of a sudden."
  • "All the vandalism and stuff, that's hurting Oakland more."
  • "I really get angry and get tired of people who think 'let's go to Oakland and make a name for ourself.' We struggle with so many issues -- we struggle with violence, we struggle with education -- the educational issue in this city is horrible. And we don't have time to spend a lot of money on foolishness..."
  • "If you look at all the violence, there's no violence without the cops."
  • "If you're going to occupy with the intentions of getting the attention of the one percent, occupying a poor place -- they don't care about that. The one percent doesn't live in downtown Oakland."

A.M. Splash: Emails Show UCB Chancellor Didn't Question Use of Batons on Protesters; Activist Says He Lied to Obtain Climate Papers

Add your comment
  • UC chancellor raised no objection to baton report (SF Chronicle)

    E-mails have surfaced that for the first time reveal UC Berkeley Chancellor Robert Birgeneau was informed on Nov. 9 while traveling that police used batons to forcibly remove an encampment involving hundreds of student Occupy protesters, yet did not call a halt to their use.

  • Plan to end juvenile justice division faces fight (SF Chronicle)

    A group of criminal justice leaders are preparing to fight a plan by Gov. Jerry Brown to entirely phase out the state's Division of Juvenile Justice over the next three years and return the most violent and troubled youths to county facilities, despite support for the proposal by some experts.

  • Activist Says He Lied to Obtain Climate Papers (NY Times)

    A prominent environmental researcher, activist and blogger from California admitted Monday night that he had deceitfully obtained and distributed confidential internal materials from the Heartland Institute, a libertarian group based in Chicago devoted in part to questioning the reality of global warming. Peter H. Gleick, founder and president of the Pacific Institute for Studies in Development, Environment and Security, wrote in a statement published on The Huffington Post that he had posed as someone else to get the materials, which include fund-raising and strategy documents intended only for the board and top executives of the group.

  • Initiative glut taking a toll on California resources (Bay Area News Group)

    ...(T)he burgeoning number of proposed initiatives -- and the hundreds of thousands of dollars the cash-strapped state spends each year reviewing them all -- has led to a lively Capitol debate on whether it's time to do something to stop frivolous initiatives. And, boy, are some of them wacky.

  • Lines redrawn for Santa Clara County Board of Education (SJ Mercury News)

    Boundaries have been redrawn for the Santa Clara County Board of Education, resulting in two trustees who will have to run against each other if they want to try to retain their seats. The changes also create a district with no incumbent when the seat comes up for election in 2014. The lines, approved last week by the little-known Santa Clara County Committee on School District Organization, draws electoral districts for the seven countywide trustees.

  • Marin County curbs payroll costs as overtime plunges (Marin Independent Journal)

    Belt-tightening at the Marin Civic Center has kept the county payroll in check for the first time in years, thanks to cutbacks in staffing as well as judicious use of overtime. The tab for regular payroll, overtime and other pay perks hit about $173.7 million last fiscal year, up $2.4 million from $171.3 million four years ago, with the overall tab rising primarily due to promotions and pay "step" increases handed out in line with union contracts.

  • Sonoma County prosecutors ask judge to remove video (Santa Rosa Press Democrat)

    Sonoma County prosecutors are seeking a court order to remove two videos posted on the Internet that appear to show a Santa Rosa police officer pummeling a West County artist during an arrest.

  • Oakland A's, Manny Ramirez agree on minor league contract (Bay Area News Group)

    The A's agreed to terms with free-agent designated hitter Manny Ramirez on a minor league contract Monday, tying themselves to one of baseball's most productive -- and controversial -- sluggers of all time. The deal is pending a physical, but Ramirez is expected to report to spring training by the end of this week. He must serve a 50-game suspension for violating Major League Baseball's drug policy for a second time, meaning he would become eligible for a May 30 game at Minnesota, on his 40th birthday.