Savvy Searcher

RECENT POSTS

Searching for Numbers: a Powerful Tool for Makers and Students

Mark Anderson "For those about to rock..."

Flickr: Mark Anderson

At a recent conference, professor Kristin Fontichiaro described watching a seven-year-old work his way through do-it-yourself resources online. Because he was comparing  concrete items (e.g., his circuit versus that in the tutorial), and not abstract concepts, the student immediately understood what was a credible resource and what was not.

Although the task was about building a circuit, the student was also demonstrating meaningful, informed judgments about the quality of a given source, and understanding clearly what the impact of a quality resource would be on his final project.

In the same way, using advanced operators when searching online can help students and makers zero in on exactly what they’re searching for. For example, when a student finds a great project on one of many DIY community sites, such as making a multi-color LED bracelet on Instructables, and wants to see what similar ideas that specific website offers, the site: operator makes it possible.

Another powerful operator for making and other pursuits comes from placing two dots between two numbers.

Take a look at these search results for the query [makerfaire 2006..2010]. What are those two little dots between the numbers telling Google to do? Continue reading

Why It’s Important to Understand Google Ranking

"Question Mark Made of Puzzle Pieces" by Horia Varlan

"Question Mark Made of Puzzle Pieces" by Horia Varlan

Students rely heavily on ranking–or how search tools decide the order in which to display results–to help them select sources to read. Most of us do, but the data about students comes from researchers Andrew Asher of Bucknell University and Lynda Duke of Illinois Wesleyan University.

The researchers presented the findings of their latest study and forthcoming paper on how university students do research, at the American Library Association Annual conference, and in the talk they emphasized some of their takeaways about what research skills should look like, including an overall focus on critical thinking skills and the ability to evaluate the quality of sources.

Because of the reliance on ranking, Asher and Duke argue, it’s critical for students to have some understanding of how each search tool they use makes these decisions.

To that end, here are a few resources to help understand and communicate with students about how Google ranks search results. Understanding the fundamentals of ranking will help students write better queries and make better choices about where to click.

  • This video, How Search Works by Matt Cutts gives a nice overview of how items are ranked.

KEEPING UP ON CHANGES

To dig even deeper, check out the monthly posts on the Inside Search blog that cover the changes made to improve search quality. Here, you can see results to the query [site:insidesearch.blogspot.com intitle:"search quality highlights" ranking], which uses a site: operator to limit results to pages within the Inside Search blog and uses an “intitle”: operator to limit to posts that have the phrase “search quality highlights” in the title. If you click on the link, you Continue reading

Knowledge Graph: Easy Fact Finding Allows for Deeper Search

Wondering how to use Google’s new Knowledge Graph? The resulting panels to the right of the main results are meant to move research beyond simple data retrieval into deeper topics. At the same time, the new tool could serve as a better way to use key words.

The new sidebar shows key facts that users might want when they run specific types of queries, such as people, animals, and geographic locations.

How can this tool be used for student searches? Here are some ideas.

READY REFERENCE

A student searching for [Tolstoy] would see this box to the right of her regular search results:

Precisely which data points appear in this panel are largely based on a combination of two things: what facts searchers most often look for when they Google [Tolstoy] and which facts are actually verifiable through an automated process.

For students, this quick presentation of facts can free up time to dig into the deeper questions. For example, what’s the link between Tolstoy and Henry David Thoreau? Imagine a whole new version of the “Six Degrees of Separation” game, where these panels inspire deeper research into a James Burke-esque set of connections among entities.

TRACKING FACTS

How can we confirm the information presented? The main image for each topic lists a source, and the topic summary is often from Wikipedia, but what about the rest of the information? Playing around with the information in the boxes reveals some insight into this.

When a search triggers a box, each fact in it actually has one or more hyperlinks. Check out the results for Sagittaria, the genus including the now-famous Katniss, and note that the classifications Continue reading

How to Identify Mysterious Images Online

Image that a student finds online

Image wrongly attributed to Rube Goldberg

Can’t figure out the source of an image you found online? There’s an easy trick you might not know about — and it’s an essential tool for citing sources.

Students who find images they want to use in projects need to follow the appropriate rules of citation: state the title and the original source.

But with so much misinformation and mis-attribution online, students might either change the research topic to avoid the problem altogether or simply cite the source poorly.

Take, for example, a student wanting to use this image (above) labeled as a cartoon by Rube Goldberg. Since he wants to use it in a project, he must find the original source of the image, but when he tries looking through Rube Goldberg’s illustrations of absurd, overly-complex machines, the artistic style looks different. That was a dead end.

But there’s a Google tool that allows him to use an image as a search term.

Within just a few seconds, he can discover another artist, named W. Heath Robinson, who also designed humorous machines. With just a few more clicks, he will identify “Testing Golf Drivers,” Continue reading

Websites in Different Languages Offer More Global Perspective

The wired world has made it possible for people from all across the globe to connect and learn from each other. In a few days, New York Times reporter Nicholas Kristof will host a Hangout and interview United Nations Ambassador Susan Rice during school hours. In classes across the country, students are hearing about the Greek debt crisis; presidential elections in France, Serbia, Armenia, Greece, and Egypt, as well as Secretary Clinton’s recent travels to China.

International news coverage gives us one set of perspectives on these events. But students can also have more immediate access to global conversations — in the languages that are being spoken. Here’s how.

TRANSLATED FOREIGN PAGES

Google’s translated foreign pages offer a direct view into websites created in other languages. Enter a simple query, such as [presidential election], and you’ll get a typical page of results. If you’re searching in the U.S., you’ll tend to see information on the latest Republican primaries, the date of the national election in November, and both general web search and Google News results about the upcoming election. To the left-hand side of the screen is a column showing a number of links, including one promising “More search tools.” Continue reading

Search Tip for Students: Try Predicting Your Search Results

Just as having students predict answers to math problems is a way of creating more meaningful learning, prediction can be a useful strategy in successful searching too.

Search results can be presented any number of ways: tables and charts, videos, infographs. We teach students how to develop an understanding of the kinds of information that’s best conveyed with timelines, maps, or diagrams. Using what they know about all the different kinds of content and media, they can apply the same theories of predicting what they might find on their online searches.

Here are some guidelines for asking predictive questions even before they launch their search.

  • When I run this search, what do I expect to appear?It’s extremely useful to get in the habit of spending just an instant anticipating what kind of results you expect your search terms to find. When students do not ask this question and search terms bring back unexpected results, they often come away feeling that there’s nothing there. But when students prep themselves by considering what they expect to appear and then skim the first page of results, they’re better prepared to spot any clues indicating that their terms have a meaning they did not foresee. It can be fun to practice this anticipation in class. Try asking students to anticipate what will appear for the searches [who], [the who], and [a who] in turn.
  • When I find this answer, what do I expect it to look like? This is where students imagine their perfect source. First, what types of words would this trusted source use? Would a doctor write about a busted arm, or possibly stick with the medical term fracture? From the Common Core standards to those from the American Association of School Librarians, we aim for thoughtful searches that consider the audience and purpose and be able to determine the format and voice that will communicate information most clearly. It stands to reason that if we Continue reading