NGLC Shifts Focus To Funding Experimental Schools

| September 10, 2013 | 3 Comments
  • Email Post
Danville Schools

For the past three years, Next Generation Learning Challenges (NGLC) has been granting money to a broad range of education ventures that used technology in education. The aim has been to help grow or scale ideas that shows some promise. Recently, however, the organization has steadily moved towards funding schools that want to shift from traditional teaching to more experimental models. This week, the organization announced it will offer a set of grants totaling $3.6 million to two school districts — Washington D.C. and Chicago — with the hopes of building up model schools in other partner cities in the future that have the support of local groups and government.

The NGLC is a partnership between the Gates Foundation, the League for Innovation in the Community College, the International Association for K-12 Online Learning (iNACOL), the Council for Chief State School Officers (CCSSO)* and EDUCAUSE, which leads the program work. The first two waves of funding (one focused on higher education and the other on K-12) focused on how technology can remove barriers to innovative educational practices.

NGLC is also accepting grant applications on a rolling basis this fall for districts throughout the country looking for funds to transform their schools. Most of the first grant recipients so far have been charter schools, but in the most recent round, which is ongoing, two non-charter public school districts have been recognized for their efforts to innovate.

“Charters are not the answer to the big scale question because even the most successful charters only have 150 schools and we’re talking about hundreds of thousands of schools total,” said Andy Calkins, deputy director of Next Generation Learning Challenges.

Danville Schools in Kentucky are one of the beneficiaries of NGLC’s whole-school model grant-giving. And according to its superintendent Carmen Coleman, the grant is funding key positions, such as a “pathways coach” to focus on helping each student come up with a workable plan for life post-graduation and school staff with unique skill sets, like an engineer fluent in German, to act as teacher assistants and add diversity of experience to the staff.

“The Next Generation grant is allowing us to fund some positions that otherwise we would have a hard time doing because we wouldn’t be able to afford it,” Coleman said.

[RELATED: $7 Million Dollar Grants Awarded to Help Boost College Readiness]

Danville began planning to shift towards a vision of school that veers away from testing and more towards project-based learning, one that balances content goals with character development goals, like nurturing students’ ability to persevere, be leaders, and think independently. That’s not easy to do in a state where teacher accountability and school ranking are based on test scores and results are published in the newspaper. “We don’t want to look bad,” Coleman said. For its part, Gates Foundation has also focused its attention on measuring “effective teaching.”

The district is seeking relief from some of the accountability requirements while pursuing a competency-based model of learning. The state Department of Education chose Danville as one of its Districts of Innovation, giving it a level of flexibility to experiment that most other Kentucky districts don’t have. The $150,000 NGLC grant is allowing them to take advantage of that flexibility and act more quickly.

NGLC’s Calkins admits the entire endeavor is a learning experience. “A lot of what we’re funding them to do is to experiment with different ways to make this happen,” Calkins said. The hope is to come up with a number of different workable models that are both affordable and scalable.

Another district grantee, Lebanon School District in Pennsylvania, won the grant for its plan to expand a pilot blended learning program in its high school. All 1,300 Lebanon high school students will learn core subjects with a mix of online and in-person instruction. The district has many low-income students and superintendent Marianne Bartley is hopeful that the new blended approach will help teachers better reach individual learners at their own level.

A core part of NGLC’s mission is to share the knowledge and discoveries broadly. Grantees sign contracts agreeing that what they produce will remain open source. Both Coleman and Bartley say they plan to access ideas of other like-minded educators with their school redesign plans.

Though technology has been the main thrust of focus for NGLC, Calkins said there’s much more to the equation. “We were trying to help catalyze tech-enabled innovations related to the Common Core,” he said. The technology made a difference for some people, but Calkin said it didn’t provide the kind of systemic change NGLC was looking to create. “They weren’t going to produce the cohesive rethinking of educational design at the K-12 level that we felt was needed,” Calkins said.

Now, the organization is funding schools trying to restructure learning to be more student-centered, competency-based and that integrate technology in effective ways. “We’re hoping that at least some of them will become hugely influential to policymakers,” Calkin said. “They could visit and say this is what it could look like.”

POST-SECONDARY INVESTMENTS

NGLC also funds projects intended to help college students stay in school and graduate on time. Though the organization started off funding tech interventions, like using student data to help sequence classes and stay on track for graduation, now it’s focusing on changing business practices of higher education to make it less expensive for students. For example, a Southern New Hampshire College initiative — College For America — charges students based on the amount of time they spend in school, not on credits taken. The competency-based model could allow a student to spend much less on college and is particularly targeted at adults who need to finish a degree they dropped earlier.

But not all projects have been successful. A grant to the MIT Media Lab to create a real-time math Olympics game challenge failed miserably, Calkins said. Schools couldn’t commit to participate in a project with set time boundaries and the challenge was set for April and May, when not all schools had covered the same content.

When projects do show some measure of success, the organizations that make up the NGLC use their extensive networks to spread the idea, offering professional development and outreach resources.

Diana Oblinger, president and CEO of EDUCAUSE, the lead organization in the NGLC partnership, said this part of their mission is crucial since the broad goal is to find solutions to big problems that work, are affordable and can be scaled up to address the needs many learners.

*Clarification 9/18/2013: This version of the story includes the International Association for K-12 Online Learning (iNACOL) and the Council for Chief State School Officers (CCSSO) as partners in the Next Generation Learning Challenge.

Related

Explore: ,

  • Email Post
  • Pingback: NGLC Shifts Focus To Funding Experimental Schools | Sisterhood of the Silver Shoes

  • Pingback: NGLC Shifts Focus To Funding Experimental Schools | College Education Aid

  • Andy Calkins

    Good, thorough summary of NGLC’s strategies, Katrina — nice job. Just one quibble, but it says something important about NGLC and our grantees.

    My citing of the MIT Media Labs project was intended as an example of NGLC’s (and our grantees’) commitment to being open about sharing missteps, failure, and lessons learned along with the successes. We are not cheerleaders in all of this; we’re striving to be organizational learners and to encourage our grantees to share the bumps along the road along with the achievements. I wouldn’t classify any of our grantees as “miserable failures” (in the absence of this larger context) for exactly that reason – they’re pushing the envelope of innovation, and if things don’t work out with their original strategy, they (and we) are ready to share those lessons in order to advance the field at large. Things didn’t work out for the Media Labs’ project in the way they’d hoped, but they learned from it and even approached us to seek approval to share their learnings at conferences. To us, that deserves genuine accolades, not finger-pointing, which is a bit what this reference looks like in the article.

    If ALL of our projects were to succeed, that might be a signal that we aren’t being bold and experimental enough in our grant selections. So, strange as it may seem to acknowledge, we value the failures nearly as much as we value the successes.

    Thanks again for a good article and for this soapbox to make a key point — not just about NGLC, but about the nature of innovation in general.

    – Andy Calkins for NGLC