<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>KQED&#039;s Climate Watch &#187; fuel standards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/tag/fuel-standards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch</link>
	<description>KQED&#039;s multimedia series providing in-depth coverage of climate-related science and policy issues from a California perspective.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 20:37:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://kqed.superfeedr.com"/>		<item>
		<title>CA Air Official Rebukes Auto Trade Group</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2011/02/07/ca-air-official-rebukes-auto-trade-group/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2011/02/07/ca-air-official-rebukes-auto-trade-group/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 23:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gretchen Weber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government & Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Air Resources Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuel standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nichols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/?p=10783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don't mess with Mary Nichols. California's top greenhouse gas regulator kicks tailpipe and takes names. <a href="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2011/02/07/ca-air-official-rebukes-auto-trade-group/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_10791"  class="wp-caption module image alignleft" style="width: 282px;"><a rel="attachment wp-att-10791" href="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2011/02/07/ca-air-official-rebukes-auto-trade-group/i80_100929-119_blog/"><img class="size-full wp-image-10791" title="I80_100929 119_blog" src="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/files/2011/02/I80_100929-119_blog.jpg" alt="" width="282" height="227" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">I-80 near the Oakland interchange known as &quot;the Maze.&quot; (Photo: Craig Miller)</p></div>
<p>In a <a href="http://www.arb.ca.gov/newsrel/2011/carb_to_auto_ceos.pdf">strongly-worded letter [PDF]</a> to the CEOs of seven major auto manufacturers, California Air Resources Board chair Mary Nichols defended California&#8217;s efforts to curb greenhouse gas emissions from cars and trucks and accused the trade group, the <a title="AAM - main" href="http://www.autoalliance.org/">Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers</a>, of misrepresenting California&#8217;s cooperation with federal agencies in letters to Congress.</p>
<p>At issue, wrote Nichols, are <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/48179979/Alliance-of-Automobile-Manufacturers-Letter-to-Chairman-Issa-January-11-2011">letters the Alliance sent to Congressmen Darryl Issa</a> (R-Vista) and Fred Upton (R-MI) in January, calling &#8220;our commitment to a national program into question.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;For the Alliance to suggest we are no longer committed to a cooperative effort is disingenuous at best, and incorrect,&#8221; wrote the Air Board chairman.</p>
<p>Nichols called on the executives to &#8220;distance&#8221; their companies &#8220;from future efforts by the Alliance to undermine the achievement of our mutual goals to set standards that will provide American consumers with cleaner and more efficient vehicles.&#8221;</p>
<p>The letter comes just as California and federal agencies <a href="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2011/01/25/creeping-along-toward-new-fuel-standards/">announced a shared deadline</a> for their collaboration to set national fuel economy and greenhouse gas standards for model year 2017-2025 cars and trucks.</p>
<p>Margot Roosevelt of the Los Angeles Times <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/greenspace/2011/02/global-warming-california-vehicle-fuel-efficiency-.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+GreenspaceEnvironmentBlog+%28Greenspace%29">has more,</a> including a response from an Alliance vice president who reportedly would not address the Nichols letter directly, but did express support for the shared fuel standards deadline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2011/02/07/ca-air-official-rebukes-auto-trade-group/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/files/2011/02/I80_100929-119_blog.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">I80_100929 119_blog</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
