<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>KQED&#039;s Climate Watch &#187; Enviromental Protection Agency</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/tag/enviromental-protection-agency/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch</link>
	<description>KQED&#039;s multimedia series providing in-depth coverage of climate-related science and policy issues from a California perspective.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 20:37:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://kqed.superfeedr.com"/>		<item>
		<title>California Truckers React to New Fuel Standards</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2011/08/10/truckers-face-new-fuel-standards/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2011/08/10/truckers-face-new-fuel-standards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 19:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Penalosa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government & Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enviromental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fuel efficiency standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trucks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/?p=14565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The trade group for California's truckers says it welcomes the new federal fuel standards for big rigs -- for the most part, anyway. <a href="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2011/08/10/truckers-face-new-fuel-standards/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_14605"  class="wp-caption module image left" style="width: 285px;"><img class="size-medium wp-image-14605" title="210676_100929 093" src="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/files/2011/08/210676_100929-093-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="285" height="213" /><p class="wp-media-credit">Craig Miller</p></div>
<p>The trade group for California&#8217;s truckers says it welcomes the new federal fuel standards for big rigs &#8212; for the most part, anyway.</p>
<p>Yesterday President Obama announced that all heavy duty vehicles must get up to 20 percent better mileage by 2014.  This marks the first ever federal fuel efficiency rules for heavy trucks and buses.</p>
<p>Michael Shaw of the <a href="http://www.caltrux.org/">California Trucking Association</a> said he welcomes the standards but wants equal focus on improving vehicle reliability.</p>
<p>&#8220;We  want reliability considered as important as fuel efficiency  because, ultimately, if a vehicle is running more efficiently, but it’s spending  more time in the shop&#8230; then you may have to purchase a new truck.&#8221; said Shaw. &#8220;So are we really getting the benefit we’re expected  to get?&#8221;</p>
<p>Shaw says these rules may also increase costs for truckers. </p>
<p>&#8220;Often times, as has been the case historically, new engine technology has lead to increases in the price of trucks,&#8221; he said. &#8220;We&#8217;ve seen that in regard to California mandates for diesel particulate  filters&#8230; which have driven up the cost of engines and trucks.&#8221;</p>
<p>The  fuel rules affect model years 2014 through 2018 and designate separate fuel standards depending on the type of vehicle. For example, semi-trucks will have to improve fuel efficiency by 23%, but   garbage trucks and fire engines will have to improve efficiency by just 10%.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress.nsf/bd4379a92ceceeac8525735900400c27/0fa1b0a71cff2962852578e70056a87b!OpenDocument">Environmental Protection Agency </a><a href="http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress.nsf/bd4379a92ceceeac8525735900400c27/0fa1b0a71cff2962852578e70056a87b!OpenDocument">estimates</a> an eight billion dollar up-front cost for the trucking  industry based on current available technology, but says truckers would make this up over a one-to-two year payback period. The agency expects the new measures to save the trucking industry $50 billion.</p>
<p><a href="http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress.nsf/bd4379a92ceceeac8525735900400c27/0fa1b0a71cff2962852578e70056a87b!OpenDocument">According to the EPA</a>, &#8220;Under the comprehensive new national program, trucks  and buses built in 2014 through 2018 will reduce oil consumption by a  projected 530 million barrels and greenhouse gas (GHG) pollution by  approximately 270 million metric tons.&#8221;</p>
<p>The new rules come just weeks after Obama announced <a href="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2011/07/29/brown-praises-tougher-federal-fuel-standards/">tough new federal fuel standards for cars and light trucks</a> built between 2017 and 2025.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2011/08/10/truckers-face-new-fuel-standards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/files/2011/08/210676_100929-093-300x225.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">210676_100929 093</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
