<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>KQED&#039;s Climate Watch &#187; Energy Star</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/tag/energy-star/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch</link>
	<description>KQED&#039;s multimedia series providing in-depth coverage of climate-related science and policy issues from a California perspective.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 20:37:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://kqed.superfeedr.com"/>		<item>
		<title>California Cities Get High Marks for Energy Efficiency</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2010/03/24/california-cities-get-high-marks-for-energy-efficiency/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2010/03/24/california-cities-get-high-marks-for-energy-efficiency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gretchen Weber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Star]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[san francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Urban Planning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/?p=5229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Los Angeles tops an EPA tally of the 25 US cities with the most energy-efficient buildings. Three other California cities make the list. <a href="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2010/03/24/california-cities-get-high-marks-for-energy-efficiency/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-medium wp-image-5237" title="87582412" src="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/files/2010/03/sf-300x200.jpg" alt="San Francisco " width="300" height="200" /></p>
<p>Los Angeles tops a new ranking <a href="http://www.energystar.gov/ia/business/downloads/2009_Top_25_cities_chart.pdf">(PDF)</a> of the 25 U.S. cities with the most energy efficient buildings, released by the Environmental Protection Agency.  With 293 <a href="http://www.energystar.gov/index.cfm?c=home.index">Energy Star</a>-rated buildings encompassing 76 million square feet of space, Los Angeles saves $93.9 million and reduces emissions equal that from electricity use by 34,800 homes, according to the EPA.</p>
<p>Washington, D.C. was ranked second, and San Francisco third.  Two other California cities made the top 25: Sacramento (16th) and San Diego (17th).  According to <a href="http://www.energystar.gov/index.cfm?fuseaction=labeled_buildings.locator">EPA data</a>, San Francisco has 173 Energy Star buildings (including Hotel Nikko and One Embarcadero Center) that save an estimated $69.4 million in energy costs and reduce emissions equivalent to 24,700 homes. Sacramento and San Diego have 61 and 58, respectively.</p>
<p>As of the end of last year, 9,000 commercial buildings had been awarded Energy Star designation since 1999, representing a combined savings in utility costs of $1.6 billion and a reduction in GHG emissions equal to that of one million homes, according to the EPA.</p>
<p>Buildings that <a href="http://www.energystar.gov/index.cfm?c=business.bus_bldgs">qualify for Energy Star</a> are those that score in the top 25%, based on the EPA&#8217;s <a href="http://www.energystar.gov/index.cfm?c=in_focus.bus_industries_focus">National Energy Performance Rating System</a>, which compares energy use among facilities of similar types on a scale of 1-100.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2010/03/24/california-cities-get-high-marks-for-energy-efficiency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/files/2010/03/sf-300x200.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">87582412</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
