<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>KQED&#039;s Climate Watch &#187; atmosphere</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/tag/atmosphere/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch</link>
	<description>KQED&#039;s multimedia series providing in-depth coverage of climate-related science and policy issues from a California perspective.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 20:37:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://kqed.superfeedr.com"/>		<item>
		<title>400 ppm: A Milestone that Means Everything, and Nothing</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2012/06/05/400-ppm-a-milestone-that-means-everything-and-nothing/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2012/06/05/400-ppm-a-milestone-that-means-everything-and-nothing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2012 20:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Climate Central</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atmosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/?p=22176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the first time in history, the atmosphere’s concentration of CO2 has topped 400 ppm <a href="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2012/06/05/400-ppm-a-milestone-that-means-everything-and-nothing/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>For the first time in history, the atmosphere’s concentration of CO2 has topped 400 ppm</strong></p>
<p>Commentary by <a href="http://www.climatecentral.org/about/people-bio/michael_lemonick">Michael D. Lemonick</a></p>
<div id="attachment_22178"  class="wp-caption module image right" style="width: 285px;"><img class="size-medium wp-image-22178" title="pollution smoke plume_ Saul Loweb_AFP_Getty" src="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/files/2012/06/pollution-smoke-plume_-Saul-Loweb_AFP_Getty-300x300.jpg" alt="" width="285" height="285" /><p class="wp-media-credit">SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty Images</p><p class="wp-caption-text">CO2 levels have been climbing since the Industrial Revolution.</p></div>
<p>I’m not big on taking note of milestones. They’re artificial, and usually meaningless, but people get all worked up about them anyway. I don’t like to stay up late on New Year’s Eve, for example, because Dec. 31 is a purely arbitrary date. Nothing real actually begins the next day, but we all pretend otherwise. I have similar feelings about the <a href="http://www.climatecentral.org/blogs/it-dont-mean-a-thing-that-first-day-of-spring/">first day of spring</a>, the temperature reaching 100° as opposed to 99° and all sorts of other magic-sounding dates and numbers that don’t have any real significance.</p>
<p>But since no law says I have to be consistent, I’m going to take note of a milestone that happened some time in the past couple of months, and which was <a href="http://researchmatters.noaa.gov/news/Pages/arcticCO2.aspx">reported last week</a> by NOAA. For the first time in recorded history, and almost certainly for much longer than that, the atmosphere’s concentration of carbon dioxide, or CO2, has nipped above 400 parts per million in at least one part of the world. Monitoring stations in Alaska, northern Europe, and Asia have all noted readings above that level during this past spring.</p>
<p>In one sense, this isn’t all that important. There’s no meaningful difference between 399 ppm and 400, and the current world average is more like 393. Even in the Arctic, scientists know the CO2 level will drop back below 400 this summer, as trees in the Northern Hemisphere suck carbon dioxide back out of the atmosphere (you can <a href="http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/">see the annual ups and downs</a> as trees start growing in the spring and go into hibernation in the fall). We won’t get to a world average of 400 for several years yet.</p>
<p>Climate scientists generally agree with all that, but suggest that the 400 ppm milestone is important anyway, for symbolic reasons. “It&#8217;s just a reminder to everybody that we haven&#8217;t fixed this and we&#8217;re still in trouble,” Jim Butler at NOAA’s Earth System Research Lab told the Associated Press.</p>
<p>I don’t know if the reminder will do much good, given the seeming indifference with which policymakers have responded to earlier CO2 milestones. I think reaching 400 parts per million anywhere in the world is crucially important for an entirely different reason: however much CO2 is in the atmosphere today is the minimum level we’re going to have to live with for the indefinite future. Once carbon dioxide is swirling around in the stratosphere above us, it will stay there for hundreds and hundreds of years. It’s as though you gained the most weight in your life, and knew you’d never weigh even a single pound less, ever.</p>
<p>CO2 does eventually get pulled back out of the atmosphere by natural processes, but that happens very slowly. Climate scientists like to compare the atmosphere to a bathtub half-full of water, with a very slow drain and a slowly trickling faucet. If the drain and the trickle are balanced, the water level never changes — just as the trickle of natural CO2 into the atmosphere and the drainage into trees, carbonate rocks and other places have been in balance for at least 2,000 years, and probably more. Atmospheric CO2 hovered at around 270-290 parts per million that whole time, and the climate stayed more or less stable.</p>
<div id="attachment_22177"  class="wp-caption module image right" style="width: 285px;"><img class="size-medium wp-image-22177" title="6-4-12_Mike_MaunaLoaCO2graphasofMay2012-425x299" src="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/files/2012/06/6-4-12_Mike_MaunaLoaCO2graphasofMay2012-425x299-300x211.gif" alt="" width="285" height="200" /><p class="wp-media-credit">NOAA</p><p class="wp-caption-text">Recent monthly mean CO2 measured at Mauna Loa Observatory in Hawaii.</p></div>
<p>Since the wholesale burning of fossil fuels began with the Industrial Revolution, however, CO2 levels have been climbing. The faucet has been opened wider, but the drain is still very slow. And even if we manage to cut emissions significantly — something that’s not looking likely anytime soon — the faucet will still open wider than it was in pre-industrial times. CO2 levels will continue to climb, just not as fast.</p>
<p>So once we get to 400 (or 425 or 450 or 500 or whatever), that’s where we’ll be for the foreseeable future. The elevated temperatures caused by this crucial heat-trapping gas will be with us indefinitely as well. The world’s glaciers and ice caps will continue to melt — just think of the difference between putting a small block of ice in a hot oven for 10 seconds and putting it in there for an hour. The oceans will continue to warm. As a result of both the melting and warming, <a href="http://www.climatecentral.org/blogs/400-ppm-a-milestone-that-means-everything-and-nothing/sealevel.climatecentral.org">sea level</a> will continue to rise. Scientists expect the oceans to be perhaps 3 feet higher by 2100, but it won’t stop then (which means, by the way, that 2100 is another meaningless milestone).</p>
<p>And all of that’s going to be true even if we cut back drastically on emissions. If we don’t, then every new CO2 milestone — 500 ppm, 800, 964, whatever number you choose — will be the new the level of climate-changing pollution the planet will have to deal with at the very minimum from that time onward.</p>
<p>Maybe that’s another reason for me to ignore milestones from now on. They’re either meaningless, or highly depressing. Or, as in this case, both at once.</p>
<p><em>A version of this post also appears on</em> <a href="http://www.climatecentral.org/blogs/400-ppm-a-milestone-that-means-everything-and-nothing/">Climate Central</a>, Climate Watch&#8217;s<em> content partner.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2012/06/05/400-ppm-a-milestone-that-means-everything-and-nothing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/files/2012/06/pollution-smoke-plume_-Saul-Loweb_AFP_Getty-300x300.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">pollution smoke plume_ Saul Loweb_AFP_Getty</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/files/2012/06/6-4-12_Mike_MaunaLoaCO2graphasofMay2012-425x299-300x211.gif" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">6-4-12_Mike_MaunaLoaCO2graphasofMay2012-425x299</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Year-Long Sky Journal as Video Mosaic</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2011/11/16/a-year-long-sky-journal-as-video-mosaic/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2011/11/16/a-year-long-sky-journal-as-video-mosaic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 20:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Miller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Get Involved]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atmosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weather]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/?p=16659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A motion mosaic of our ever-changing, endlessly fascinating atmosphere. <a href="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2011/11/16/a-year-long-sky-journal-as-video-mosaic/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>A motion mosaic of our ever-changing, endlessly fascinating atmosphere</strong></p>
<div id="attachment_16669"  class="wp-caption module image left" style="width: 257px;"><a href="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2011/11/16/a-year-long-sky-journal-as-video-mosaic/murphygrab/" rel="attachment wp-att-16669"><img class="size-full wp-image-16669" title="MurphyGrab" src="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/files/2011/11/MurphyGrab.jpg" alt="" width="257" height="200" /></a><p class="wp-media-credit">Ken Murphy / Murphlab</p><p class="wp-caption-text">Detail from Ken Murphy&#039;s video sky mosaic</p></div>
<p>About two years ago, <a title="Murphlab - about" href="http://www.murphlab.com/about/">Ken Murphy</a> set up a tripod on the roof of San Francisco&#8217;s <a title="Exploratorium - main" href="http://www.exploratorium.edu/">Exploratorium</a> science museum and aimed his video camera at a particular patch of sky. He&#8217;s spent the two years since shooting time-lapse sequences from his makeshift observatory and has stitched them together into this wonderful visual tableau.</p>
<p>Murphy, who is a web developer at KQED and a former artist-in-residence at the Exploratorium, says the project grew out of &#8212; well &#8212; boredom. He became restless with his experimentation with art works using LED lights. He says he was looking for more natural movement. So Murphy went dumpster-diving for parts and cobbled together a computer-controlled camera that would record the same sky segment every ten seconds, around the clock. He says it took two years of shooting to stitch together one full year of images. Eventually he found himself sorting through three million video frames for the mosaic.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/PNln_me-XjI" frameborder="0" width="560" height="315"></iframe></p>
<p>But Murphy didn&#8217;t want his frames to be too predictable, so he settled on a sky patch about 45 degrees above the northern horizon, where neither the sun nor moon would enter the picture.</p>
<p>Given his location on the tip of the San Francisco peninsula, what you do see is plenty of fog and rain. Murphy says viewers are often surprised at &#8220;how much blue&#8221; is in the finished piece.</p>
<div id="attachment_16672"  class="wp-caption module image right" style="width: 200px;"><a href="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2011/11/16/a-year-long-sky-journal-as-video-mosaic/kmurphy_rig/" rel="attachment wp-att-16672"><img class="size-full wp-image-16672" title="KMurphy_rig" src="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/files/2011/11/KMurphy_rig.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="199" /></a><p class="wp-media-credit">Alexander Tarrant</p><p class="wp-caption-text">Murphy with his rooftop camera rig</p></div>
<p>Murphy says &#8220;Patterns that occur in nature sort of resonate with people,&#8221; though he wanted to capture something &#8220;outside our immediate scope of perception.&#8221; He thought some kind of time-lapse imagery would provide that. &#8220;I wanted to have a certain fluidity to it,&#8221; he told me.</p>
<p><a title="Murphylab - project" href="http://www.murphlab.com/2011/11/15/a-history-of-the-sky-for-one-year/">On Murphy&#8217;s site</a> are several earlier stages of the work, which are also interesting to watch. He says he&#8217;s now working with a team from the Exploratorium on a time-lapse study of tides. We&#8217;ll be watching that one, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2011/11/16/a-year-long-sky-journal-as-video-mosaic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	<media:content url="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/files/2011/11/MurphyGrab.jpg" medium="image" height="200" width="257"><media:thumbnail url="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/files/2011/11/MurphyGrab-60x60.jpg" height="60" width="60" /></media:content>
		<media:content url="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/files/2011/11/MurphyGrab.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">MurphyGrab</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/files/2011/11/KMurphy_rig.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">KMurphy_rig</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
