GOP Day 1: We Love The Press

Comments (1)

SANTA CLARA -- So what did we learn on this first day of the 2010 winter California Republican Party convention? In a nutshell, that messaging is king... and that part of that message is candidates love reporters.

And press conferences. And questions. Lots of them.

John Myers, KQED

Photo: John Myers, KQED

Sure, that last part of the daily lesson was punctuated by the suddenly loquacious Meg Whitman, the current GOP gubernatorial frontrunner who worked mightily to stop the presses on the 'I don't do press conferences' story of earlier this week by holding not one, but two chit chats with assembled reporters and several individual interviews with others, your blogging radio reporter included.

None of the chit chats were on the schedule, but rather were "impromptu" affairs that featured the former eBay CEO apologizing for the Tuesday campaign miscue heard nationwide, attacking her rival Steve Poizner, and attempting to answer every policy and political question in between. The campaign team insisted the Q&As were always going to be part of the game plan at this point; regardless, it was a day that may have put an end to the characterization of a media shy business executive -- a story her rivals have playing to the hilt these last few days.

That's not to imply Whitman was the only one doing the talking. Fellow guv wannabe Poizner convened a news conference that easily lasted longer than any in recent memory. On the Senate side, candidate Tom Campbell did his own mea culpa to reporters on the subject of a controversial former Muslim supporter, while the other two Senate challengers each meet with the press tomorrow... once we've recovered from asking so many questions today.

In the contest for governor, it became clear that the real battle at this point is over what kind of conservatism matters... and who has it. State GOP confabs for years have been what some jokingly called circular firing squads -- where moderates and conservatives beat each others brains out all while the cameras rolled. But at this event, it's clear the conservatives have won. Let's face it, the state's moderate GOP governor is a no-show; party leaders dismissed the issue by saying Governor Schwarzenegger has all kinds of budget issues to busy himself with. But the Guv left the state earlier today.

John Myers, KQED

Photo: John Myers, KQED

For Steve Poizner, the contest to be the most conservative candidate feels like the person playing poker who pushes all their chips into the middle of the table and dares everyone else -- in this case, the conservative GOP base -- to challenge his right to be there. Poizner endorsed not only a return to GOP strategies for denying government services to undocumented immigrant men, women, and children, but also keeping those children out of California schools (though he admitted federal laws won't necessary let that happen).

"It's time to change the rules," said Poizner. "This is about ending the madness, so that people don't come here in the first place." On the issue of welfare-to-work, Poizner endorsed the scrapping of all welfare assistance for children after two years.

Whitman later rejected Poizner's position on the issue of illegal immigrant children. "I am not in the business of punishing kids for the sins of their parents," she said, though she did endorse ways to crack down on illegal immigration. And on welfare, she again rejected an early reduction of assistance for kids, focusing instead on adults.

Instead, the former eBay chief focused her message on fiscal conservatism, an area that Poizner also believes he's in the right. So to speak. The insurance commissioner is calling for a larger tax cut than is Whitman, but Whitman touts her endorsement by the state's leading anti-tax group, the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, as proof she's in the right. (Poizner, returning serve, touts his endorsement from the conservative California Republican Assembly.)

Whitman continued to push the point that Poizner's views on several issues have changed over the years, to which the incumbent insurance commissioner said: "She doesn't want people to focus on her controversial background."

And so it goes.

On a lighter note, both candidates got off some amusing one liners today. From Whitman, it came in her dinnertime speech to convention goers when she jabbed at presumptive Democratic nominee Jerry Brown: "Moonbeams are, after all, fleeting things, and disappear before they can be pinned down."

And from Poizner, after a reporter mentioned that Whitman says she voted for SP in his unsuccessful bid for a Silicon Valley Assembly seat in 2004: "I can predict this -- Meg Whitman is going to vote for me again in 2010."

More tomorrow on the brief sit-down interview I did with Whitman, and some of the state budget issues we talked about. In the meantime, here's a quick video clip of the day's final media availability with Whitman.

RSS Subscribe

About John Myers

John Myers is senior editor of KQED's new multimedia California Politics & Government Desk.  He has covered California politics for most of the past two decades -- serving previously as Sacramento bureau chief for KQED News and, most recently, as political editor for KXTV News10 (ABC) in Sacramento. He moderated the only gubernatorial debate of 2014, and was named one of the nation's top statehouse reporters by The Washington Post. Follow him on Twitter @johnmyers.
  • Brittanicus

    With the onset of President Obama’s push for Amnesty, the opponents are mobilizing to stop this absolutely ridiculous move to legitimize the 20 to 30 million illegal aliens,when 15 million and upwards of citizens and residents are jobless. Anytime that reform rears its ugly head, pro-sovereignty, anti-illegal immigrants organization will get into the fight, even when the economy is sound? But to try and force through this Immigration reform, when millions of American are losing their homes, applying for begrudged unemployment benefit and lining up at food banks. Its just illogical that the Democrats would gather together with a few Republicans to slip through another law to reward illegal immigrants? How can they even dream this up under the circumstances? Most any element of enforcement has always remained underfunded and eyed by politicians who represents corporate welfare to compromise laws. HOW CAN THEY SAY THAT THE 1986 LAW IS BROKEN, WHEN IT NEVER WAS ENFORCED? Some of the most talented, skillful politicians-ex attorneys authored that bill, including Liberal personage Ted Kennedy? No! Its just a good excuse to arrange another AMNESTY, because previous administrations failed to secure the border or even try? Next weekend, 100,000 pro-amnesty supporters are expected to flood Washington to show their support for a blanket amnesty. This is why the Sanctuary State of California needs a governor such as Steve Poizner? He has promised to fight illegal immigration and cut-off benefits to the millions settled in the state.


    Get ready for one of the biggest battles of any reform packages that the parties throw at us? Those Patriotic Americans and legal immigrants who believe in Americas sovereignty and desire the borders be firmly secure, heavy funding for immigration enforcement and NO BLANKET AMNESTY. No MORE GOVERNMENT ENTITLEMENTS FOR ILLEGAL ALIENS AND FAMILIES. Become a member of Over a million members and growing. Are you ready to fight against OVERPOPULATION and CHAIN MIGRATION? JUST DO NOT LET UP AT CAUSING YOUR POLITICIANS PALPITATIONS AT 202-224-3121. Don’t forget to give your state lawmakers an ultimatum; NO RE-ELECTION VOTE.