<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>State of Health Blog from KQED News &#187; Tobacco tax</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.kqed.org/stateofhealth/tag/tobacco-tax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.kqed.org/stateofhealth</link>
	<description>A window into health in California</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 18:07:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>		<item>
		<title>Too Close To Call: California Tobacco Tax Losing By Slim Margin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kqed.org/stateofhealth/2012/06/06/too-close-to-call-california-tobacco-tax-losing-by-slim-margin/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=too-close-to-call-california-tobacco-tax-losing-by-slim-margin</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kqed.org/stateofhealth/2012/06/06/too-close-to-call-california-tobacco-tax-losing-by-slim-margin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 17:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rachel Dornhelm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[KQED blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tobacco tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kqed.org/stateofhealth/?p=6346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite some initial news reports that an additional dollar a pack tax on cigarettes had been defeated in the state, it could be days or weeks before the final outcome is known. On KQED&#8217;s News Fix blog Jon Brooks reports there are potentially hundreds of thousands of uncounted ballots from early and absentee voters. The &#8230; <a href="http://blogs.kqed.org/stateofhealth/2012/06/06/too-close-to-call-california-tobacco-tax-losing-by-slim-margin/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_6354" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 246px"><a href="http://blogs.kqed.org/stateofhealth/files/2012/06/cig1.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-6354" title="Tobacco tax race is too close to call (Flickr/Abdullah Najeeb)" src="http://blogs.kqed.org/stateofhealth/files/2012/06/cig1-300x282.jpg" alt="" width="236" height="221" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Tobacco tax race is too close to call (Flickr/Abdullah Najeeb)</p></div>
<p>Despite some initial news reports that an additional dollar a pack tax on cigarettes had been defeated in the state, it could be days or weeks before the final outcome is known.</p>
<p>On <a href="http://blogs.kqed.org/newsfix/2012/06/06/tobacco-tax-losing/">KQED&#8217;s News Fix blog</a> Jon Brooks reports there are potentially hundreds of thousands of uncounted ballots from early and absentee voters.</p>
<p>The money that poured into this campaign was significant, though <a href="http://blogs.kqed.org/stateofhealth/2012/06/05/californias-tobacco-tax-campaign-funds-for-against-prop-29/">lopsided as we reported yesterday</a>. Today on the <em><a href="http://www.californiareport.org/">California Report</a></em>, Kenny Goldberg looked at h<a href="http://www.californiareport.org/archive/R201206060850/b">ow that seemed to affect the campaign</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Supporters of Prop 29 had a popular spokesman: seven-time Tour de France champion Lance Armstrong. They also had the American Lung Association, the American Cancer Association, and doctors groups pushing the measure.</p>
<p>With early polls showing a vast majority of Californians in favor, advocates were sitting pretty. But then tobacco companies weighed in with a massive ad campaign on TV and by mail. The ads said Prop 29 would create a new government bureaucracy, with little accountability. By late May, the ads had done their job: polls showed support for Prop 29 had plummeted.</p>
<p>Tobacco companies spent nearly 49 million dollars to fight Prop 29. In contrast, supporters raised about 12.3 million dollars.</p>
<p>California used to have one of the highest tobacco taxes in the nation. But since the state last raised them in 1998, California’s rate had fallen to 33<sup>rd</sup>.</p></blockquote>
<p>New York State has the highest tax in the U.S. at $4.35 per pack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kqed.org/stateofhealth/2012/06/06/too-close-to-call-california-tobacco-tax-losing-by-slim-margin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://blogs.kqed.org/stateofhealth/files/2012/06/cig1-300x282.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Tobacco tax race is too close to call (Flickr/Abdullah Najeeb)</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
