<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>State of Health Blog from KQED News &#187; Susan G. Komen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.kqed.org/stateofhealth/tag/susan-g-komen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.kqed.org/stateofhealth</link>
	<description>A window into health in California</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:24:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>		<item>
		<title>Komen Will Continue Funding Planned Parenthood &#8230; at Least For Now</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kqed.org/stateofhealth/2012/02/03/komen-will-continue-funding-planned-parenthood-at-least-for-now/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kqed.org/stateofhealth/2012/02/03/komen-will-continue-funding-planned-parenthood-at-least-for-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 20:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Aliferis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tests & Treatments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan G. Komen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kqed.org/stateofhealth/?p=2807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was only Tuesday when news broke that Susan G. Komen would cease its funding of Planned Parenthood for breast cancer screening and other programs.  In the days since, reaction has been swift and heated. Komen said it had new funding guidelines that prohibit the foundation from funding groups under investigation. While a Republican member of Congress has announced an intention to hold hearings of Planned Parenthood, critics say the intent is political. Hearings have yet to be held. <a href="http://blogs.kqed.org/stateofhealth/2012/02/03/komen-will-continue-funding-planned-parenthood-at-least-for-now/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_2811" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://blogs.kqed.org/stateofhealth/files/2012/02/Komen_PInkBalloons_BrandiKorte_Flickr_02032012.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-2811" title="(Brandi Korte: Flickr)" src="http://blogs.kqed.org/stateofhealth/files/2012/02/Komen_PInkBalloons_BrandiKorte_Flickr_02032012-300x225.jpg" alt="(Brandi Korte: Flickr)" width="300" height="225" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">(Brandi Korte: Flickr)</p></div>
<p>It was only Tuesday when news broke that Susan G. <a title="http://blogs.kqed.org/stateofhealth/2012/02/01/susan-g-komen-vs-planned-parenthood/" href="http://blogs.kqed.org/stateofhealth/2012/02/01/susan-g-komen-vs-planned-parenthood/" target="_blank">Komen would cease its funding</a> of Planned Parenthood for breast cancer screening and other programs.</p>
<p>In the days since, reaction has been swift and heated. Komen said it had new funding guidelines that prohibit the foundation from funding groups under investigation. While a Republican member of Congress has announced an intention to hold hearings of Planned Parenthood, critics say the intent is political. Hearings have yet to be held.</p>
<p>Today, Nancy Brinker, Founder and CEO of the Foundation announced what at first appeared to be a reversal and <a title="http://ww5.komen.org/KomenNewsArticle.aspx?id=19327354148" href="http://ww5.komen.org/KomenNewsArticle.aspx?id=19327354148" target="_blank">explained in a statement</a> published on their website:<span id="more-2807"></span></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>&#8220;</strong>We want to apologize to the American public for recent decisions that cast doubt upon our commitment to our mission of saving women’s lives.  The events of this week have been deeply unsettling for our supporters, partners and friends and all of us at Susan G. Komen.  We have been distressed at the presumption that the changes made to our funding criteria were done for political reasons or to specifically penalize Planned Parenthood.  They were not.</p>
<p>Our original desire was to fulfill our fiduciary duty to our donors by not funding grant applications made by organizations under investigation.  We will amend the criteria to make clear that disqualifying investigations must be criminal and conclusive in nature and not political. That is what is right and fair.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>But many observers have picked up on nuance that comes later in the statement:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;We will continue to fund existing grants, including those of Planned Parenthood, and preserve their eligibility to apply for future grants, while maintaining the ability of our affiliates to make funding decisions that meet the needs of their communities.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><a title="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/02/03/1061450/-Lazy-media-reports-Komen-Foundation-decision-as-reversal-It-isnt" href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/02/03/1061450/-Lazy-media-reports-Komen-Foundation-decision-as-reversal-It-isnt" target="_blank">The Daily Kos </a>isn&#8217;t so sure this is a true reversal in Komen&#8217;s stance. As their reporter states:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;I just got off the phone with a Komen board member, and he confirmed that the announcement does not mean that Planned Parenthood is guaranteed future grants — a demand he said would be “unfair” to impose on Komen.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>This statement in combination with the Board member&#8217;s quote certainly seems as if Komen views Planned Parenthood as a grantee. But in its <a title="http://www.plannedparenthood.org/about-us/newsroom/press-releases/statement-cecile-richards-planned-parenthood-federation-america-regarding-todays-komen-announce-38686.htm" href="http://www.plannedparenthood.org/about-us/newsroom/press-releases/statement-cecile-richards-planned-parenthood-federation-america-regarding-todays-komen-announce-38686.htm" target="_blank">statement</a>, Planned Parenthood speaks of a &#8220;partnership&#8221; with Komen:</p>
<blockquote><p>“In recent weeks, the treasured relationship between the Susan G. Komen for the Cure Foundation and Planned Parenthood has been challenged, and we are now heartened that we can continue to work in partnership toward our shared commitment to breast health for the most underserved women. We are enormously grateful that the Komen Foundation has clarified its grantmaking criteria, and we look forward to continuing our partnership with Komen partners, leaders and volunteers.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><a title="http://blogs.kqed.org/stateofhealth/jp/quick-read-susan-g-komen-official-resigned-over-planned-parenthood-decision/" href="http://blogs.kqed.org/stateofhealth/jp/quick-read-susan-g-komen-official-resigned-over-planned-parenthood-decision/" target="_blank">The Atlantic</a> has a been closely following the politics of the back and forth. In a <a title="http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/02/komen-changes-its-mind-on-planned-parenthood-but-will-donors-come-back/252524/" href="http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/02/komen-changes-its-mind-on-planned-parenthood-but-will-donors-come-back/252524/" target="_blank">post</a> today, a senior editor sees more controversy to come. &#8220;I doubt that this is over &#8212; pro-lifers are now going to have their own round of outraged protest.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kqed.org/stateofhealth/2012/02/03/komen-will-continue-funding-planned-parenthood-at-least-for-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://blogs.kqed.org/stateofhealth/files/2012/02/Komen_PInkBalloons_BrandiKorte_Flickr_02032012-300x225.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">(Brandi Korte: Flickr)</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Susan G. Komen Vs. Planned Parenthood</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kqed.org/stateofhealth/2012/02/01/susan-g-komen-vs-planned-parenthood/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kqed.org/stateofhealth/2012/02/01/susan-g-komen-vs-planned-parenthood/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 23:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Aliferis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tests & Treatments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planned Parenthood Federation of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan G. Komen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kqed.org/stateofhealth/?p=2722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[        <media:content url="http://blogs.kqed.org/stateofhealth/files/2012/02/Komen_Flickr_BrandiKorte_02012012.jpg" medium="image" />
Reaction has been swift since the AP broke the news yesterday that the breast cancer charity, Susan G. Komen for the Cure is withdrawing future funding of any Planned Parenthood affiliates. <a href="http://blogs.kqed.org/stateofhealth/2012/02/01/susan-g-komen-vs-planned-parenthood/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
	        <media:content url="http://blogs.kqed.org/stateofhealth/files/2012/02/Komen_Flickr_BrandiKorte_02012012.jpg" medium="image" />
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_2737" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://blogs.kqed.org/stateofhealth/files/2012/02/Komen_Flickr_BrandiKorte_02012012.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-2737" title="(Brandi Korte: Flickr)" src="http://blogs.kqed.org/stateofhealth/files/2012/02/Komen_Flickr_BrandiKorte_02012012-300x200.jpg" alt="(Brandi Korte: Flickr)" width="300" height="200" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">(Brandi Korte: Flickr)</p></div>
<p>Reaction has been swift since the AP broke the news yesterday that the breast cancer charity, <a title="http://ww5.komen.org/" href="http://ww5.komen.org/" target="_blank">Susan G. Komen for the Cure</a> is withdrawing future funding of any Planned Parenthood affiliates.</p>
<p>The <a title="http://www.plannedparenthood.org/" href="http://www.plannedparenthood.org/" target="_blank">Planned Parenthood Federation of America</a> said pressure from anti-abortion groups sparked the Komen decision. The Komen Foundation counters that its guidelines do not permit funding if any organization is under a governmental investigation.</p>
<p>But those guidelines appear to be recent and have political underpinnings. As <a title="http://jezebel.com/5881057/susan-g-komen-foundation-bows-to-pro+life-bullying-stops-contributing-to-planned-parenthood" href="http://jezebel.com/5881057/susan-g-komen-foundation-bows-to-pro+life-bullying-stops-contributing-to-planned-parenthood" target="_blank">Jezebel</a> reports:<span id="more-2722"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>Interestingly, this brand new rule that suddenly appeared in the books of the Komen Foundation just so happened to coincide with a Congressional investigation launched by a Republican legislator, who himself was pressured by the pro-life group Americans United for Life. And last year&#8217;s assault on Planned Parenthood also coincided with the addition of a vocally anti-abortion ex-politician to the ranks of Susan G Komen For the Cure.</p>
<p>Karen Handel, who was <a href="http://rncnyc2004.blogspot.com/2010/07/sarah-palin-endorses-karen-handel-for.html">endorsed</a> by Sarah Palin during her unsuccessful bid for governor of Georgia in 2010, has been the Foundation&#8217;s Senior Vice President for Public Policy since April 2011. During her gubernatorial candidacy, she ran on an anti-choice platform, vowing that if elected, she&#8217;d defund Planned Parenthood.</p></blockquote>
<p>Planned Parenthood now has a banner on its homepage announcing the end of Komen funding and asking viewers to &#8220;Help Us Continue Lifesaving Breast Cancer Screenings.&#8221;</p>
<p>“We are alarmed and saddened that the Susan G. Komen for the Cure Foundation appears to have succumbed to political pressure,&#8221; said Cecile Richards, president of Planned Parenthood Federation of America <a title="http://www.plannedparenthood.org/about-us/newsroom/press-releases/alarmed-saddened-komen-foundation-succumbing-political-pressure-planned-parenthood-launches-fun-38629.htm?utm_source=twitter&amp;utm_medium=tweet&amp;utm_campaign=komen" href="http://www.plannedparenthood.org/about-us/newsroom/press-releases/alarmed-saddened-komen-foundation-succumbing-political-pressure-planned-parenthood-launches-fun-38629.htm?utm_source=twitter&amp;utm_medium=tweet&amp;utm_campaign=komen" target="_blank">in a statement</a>. &#8220;Our greatest desire is for Komen to reconsider this policy and recommit to the partnership on which so many women count.&#8221;</p>
<p>The clinic serving <a title="http://www.plannedparenthood.org/orange-san-bernardino/" href="http://www.plannedparenthood.org/orange-san-bernardino/">Orange and San Bernardino Counties</a> appears to be the only Planned Parenthood affiliate in California to receive funds from Komen. That funding has been significant. For the last seven years, Komen has helped to fund breast cancer screening this affiliate does annually for 15-20,000 women, Stephanie Kight, Sr. Vice President of the affiliate told State of Health.</p>
<p>Last year, 400 women needed diagnostic services and Komen covered a little over half of those. &#8220;Komen was also a key funder in education and screening in marginalized communities, especially the Vietnamese community, which has so little information about health care and breast cancer,&#8221; Kight said.  “Women’s health care and breast cancer care are way too important, and way too important to women all over this country, to be used as a political football. It’s just tragic.”</p>
<p>Meanwhile public comments on Twitter and Facebook have been heated. A non-scientific sampling showed sentiment running against Komen, even on <a title="http://apps.komen.org/Forums/tm.aspx?&amp;m=343860" href="http://apps.komen.org/Forums/tm.aspx?&amp;m=343860" target="_blank">its own message board</a>, as this post demonstrates:</p>
<blockquote><p>I am with all of you. I will return any Komen solicitations from friends with an explanation that i will no longer donate to Breast Cancer research through this organization. What a shame! It&#8217;s outrageous that this organization, like so many others, is allowing itself to be bullied by the virulently anti-woman minority in Congress. Shame, shame, shame</p></blockquote>
<p>Those who support Komen&#8217;s move echo this tweet:</p>
<p>&#8220;Awesome news broke today!&#8221; tweeted @LilaGraceRose, &#8220;Susan G. Komen has finally stopped funding Planned Parenthood!&#8221;</p>
<p>Many other tweets show people responding with their wallets. &#8220;I just donated to Planned Parenthood to make up shortfall from shameful abandonment by Susan G. <s>#</s>Komen Fdn,&#8221; tweeted @KTKeith.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kqed.org/stateofhealth/2012/02/01/susan-g-komen-vs-planned-parenthood/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
	<media:content url="http://blogs.kqed.org/stateofhealth/files/2012/02/Komen_Flickr_BrandiKorte_02012012.jpg" medium="image" height="854" width="1280"><media:thumbnail url="http://blogs.kqed.org/stateofhealth/files/2012/02/Komen_Flickr_BrandiKorte_02012012-60x60.jpg" height="60" width="60" /></media:content>
		<media:content url="http://blogs.kqed.org/stateofhealth/files/2012/02/Komen_Flickr_BrandiKorte_02012012-300x200.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">(Brandi Korte: Flickr)</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
