Employer Mandate


Health Law Mandate in Effect, Hits Employers Unevenly

(Getty Images)

Business owners who employ more low-wage workers, such as restaurants and retail, are likely to feel the employer mandate the most. (Getty Images)

By Emily Bazar, CHCF Center for Health Reporting

Remember those end-of-the world predictions from Nostradamus, the ancient Mayans and Pat Robertson that we somehow survived?

“If I’m a restaurant owner and don’t offer coverage to my employees now, my world will change a lot after Jan. 1 and it will change for the workers as well.”  

The “employer mandate” may be Obamacare’s version of that.

One of the most-feared aspects of the Affordable Care Act took effect Jan. 1 after some delay, and requires large businesses to provide health coverage to their employees or face financial penalties.

Despite the concerns surrounding the mandate, it won’t hit all businesses hard, nor will it provide coverage to all uninsured workers. Instead, just like the rest of Obamacare, its impacts will be felt unevenly, among some industries and employees more than others.

Think restaurants, retail and low-wage workers.

Q: My employer doesn’t offer health insurance. Will that change under Obamacare?

A: It all depends. Continue reading

Obama Administration Delays Employer Mandate For One Year; Reaction in California

(Photo: David McNew)

(Photo: David McNew)

The Obama administration announced Tuesday afternoon that the federal health law’s employer mandate, which requires large employers to provide health insurance to full-time workers or pay a fine, has been delayed for one year.

Other key elements of the Affordable Care Act will stay in place, such as the individual requirement to have health insurance and the new marketplaces, such as Covered California.

The administration’s announcement cited “concerns about the complexity of the requirements and the need for more time to implement them effectively” as the reason for the change.

“As far as Covered California is concerned, we don’t see this affecting our implementation of the exchange.”
“This is a wise, sensible and pragmatic decision on the part of the administration,” said Bill Kramer, executive director for national health policy at the Pacific Business Group on Health, a large employer group focused on health care. He called the reporting requirements an “administrative burden” on businesses, and said this delay “allows both the administration to simplify reporting requirements and allows employers more time to put in place their own systems to insure to insure that they can meet those reporting requirements.” Continue reading