Donate

The ‘Tahoe Tsunami': New Study Envisions Early Geologic Event

  • Share:
  • Facebook
  • Pinterest
  • Reddit
  • Email
Lake Tahoe landslide scar

Eagle Rock, above the town of Tahoe Pines, overlooks the northern part of McKinney Bay, a giant landslide scar bitten out of the flank of Lake Tahoe. The rock sits in the glacial valley of Blackwood Creek, but the moraine at its toe is missing—evidence that the slide and mega-tsunami erased it after the latest ice age. (Andrew Alden photo)

Once upon a time, geologists tell us, a massive chunk of Lake Tahoe’s western shore collapsed into the water in a tremendous landslide. The water responded by sloshing high onto the surrounding shores in a series of landslide tsunamis. A major new study in the journal Geosphere adds much new detail to that story, tracing massive features around and beneath the lake. And it places the date of the fearsome event near the time that humans first visited it.

Lake Tahoe is a peaceful mountain resort area today, but its geologic past has been long and violent. Its very presence is due to tectonic stretching of the Earth’s crust across Nevada, which has opened large basins from California’s Sierra Nevada crest all the way to Salt Lake City, Utah. The Tahoe basin has been there for roughly 3 million years, during which time it’s seen outbreaks of volcanism and countless major earthquakes.

Forty years ago the first sonar survey of Lake Tahoe showed evidence that bite-shaped McKinney Bay, in the middle of the lake’s western shore, is a scar left by a very large landslide and that huge pieces of that slide, as much as a kilometer long, are strewn across the lake bottom. Another sonar survey in 1998 revealed the slide in startling detail, as seen below.

Lake Tahoe DEM

Digital elevation model of central Lake Tahoe showing McKinney Bay (left) and landslide deposits crossing the entire lake (from USGS data)

Since that time, as funding permits, geologists have sent submarine-mounted cameras into the lake and taken core samples of its sediment. They’ve also tramped the shores and mountainsides, mapping the signs the catastrophe left there.

The new paper in the August issue of the journal Geosphere, by veteran researchers James G. Moore, Richard Schweikert and Christopher Kitts, assembles the evidence old and new into a scenario of that convulsive day. Much of their paper represents significant progress on the Tahoe tsunami problem.

The landslide involved a body of rock made unstable by movement on a large-scale fault along the western shore. The slide, presumably triggered by an earthquake on that fault, sent some 12.5 cubic kilometers of rock and sediment into the lake, where it pushed a corresponding amount of water out of the way as huge tsunamis, perhaps 100 meters high. Much of this water burst over the lake’s outlet at Tahoe City and rushed down the Truckee River, where house-sized boulders litter the riverbed today as far downstream as Verdi at the Nevada border.

The rest of the water washed ashore all around the lake in what the authors call a “megasplash.” Not only was the water already very muddy from the landslide, but it washed away even more sediment, plucking the landscape down to bare rock wherever it went. The authors estimate that the lake was left perhaps 10 meters lower, because most of the lake is ringed with a terrace of fresh sediment at about that depth. The lake would have sloshed back and forth for days afterward, and surely more landslides were being triggered at the time. The sediment terraces probably built up over a period of weeks.

These brand-new terraces, in turn, quickly began to collapse of their own weight, forming high-density “turbidity flows” that rolled down the slopes of the lakebed digging channels along the way. The authors mapped 15 of these submerged channels around the lake that lead from the terraces down to the lake’s floor about 500 meters deep. At the bottom of the channels, the mudflows settled down into thick aprons of sediment, where they sit today. The channels and the aprons bear gigantic ripple marks that are as much as 400 meters from crest to crest. Here are two of those channel-and-apron complexes, directly across from the slide.

Tsunami ripples in Lake Tahoe

Giant ripple marks on the surface of the Glenbrook (top) and Logan Shoals (bottom) sediment wave channel systems (from USGS data)

The authors say that the lake must have been muddy for years, and its shores a barren wasteland. All of the mud gradually blanketed the whole lake bed, making the landslide-related features look much older than they really are. Mapping on land also delineated a sheet of clean sand as thick as 2 meters spread across the flat lands at Lake Tahoe’s south end, a sign that the area was swept by large waves. More detective work on land helped the authors narrow down the time of the megaslide and megasplash to some time between 21 and 12 thousand years ago. All of this evidence fits into a terrifying picture of geologic uproar.

Such things are found elsewhere in the world, but not in a place as visible as Lake Tahoe. The authors conclude that “this one-time event in a closed lake basin provides a benchmark that can be compared to the processes that produced similar features in the ocean.” They also warn that the ground on either side of McKinney Bay is made of the same stuff and could cause similar events. These wouldn’t be half the size of the McKinney Bay slide, but they would be dire enough.

Related

Explore: , , , , , ,

Category: Geology

  • Share:
  • Facebook
  • Pinterest
  • Reddit
  • Email

About the Author ()

Andrew Alden earned his geology degree at the University of New Hampshire and moved back to the Bay Area to work at the U.S. Geological Survey for six years. He has written on geology for About.com since its founding in 1997. In 2007, he started the Oakland Geology blog, which won recognition as "Best of the East Bay" from the East Bay Express in 2010. In writing about geology in the Bay Area and surroundings, he hopes to share some of the useful and pleasurable insights that geologists give us—not just facts about the deep past, but an attitude that might be called the deep present. Read his previous contributions to QUEST, a project dedicated to exploring the Science of Sustainability.