Is Online Education Widening the Digital Divide?

| August 16, 2013 | 16 Comments
  • Email Post
sb10069478aq-001

By Charla Bear

Universities across the country are experimenting with MOOCs (massive open online courses) as a way to make higher education more affordable and accessible to all  students. The premise of MOOCs has, to some, come to mean the democratization of quality higher education, a way of equalizing the playing field for students of every demographic.

“[Students] can take these courses and say, ‘Wait a minute, I can aspire to these colleges, to Stanford, Princeton or Columbia, and therefore I’m going to try to apply there.’” said Daphne Koller, co-founder of Coursera, in an interview recently. “We hope it opens the door to a much higher success rate for students from disadvantaged backgrounds.”

Aspirational as that may seem, it may not always be the outcome.

“We … continue to be concerned that folks might imagine they are getting an Ivy League education, when in fact, they are watching other people get an Ivy League education,” says Lillian Taiz, president of the California Faculty Association and professor of history at California State Los Angeles.

Several professors at San Jose State University began creating MOOCs in January, which students could take for credit. Peter Hadreas, professor and Philosophy Department Chair at San Jose State University, says when administrators asked his department to replace lectures in an ethics class with a Harvard MOOC, faculty saw some questionable race and class implications.

“We’ve got this strange sort of upstairs/downstairs situation where the lower-class people could look at how the upper-class people were being educated.”

After watching the online Justice course, taught by Harvard Professor Michael Sandel, the philosophy faculty collectively wrote an open letter in protest. Their bottom line: it would be insulting to force diverse state university students to watch an Ivy League professor lecture to his affluent class.

“We have a very diverse student body and we’re very proud of that,” Hadreas said. “But they would watch Michael Sandel teach Harvard students and he would interpolate into his talks and dialogues how privileged they were. And they were for the most part, certainly to a greater extent, white than our student body. So we’ve got, on the one hand, this strange sort of upstairs/downstairs situation where the lower-class people could look at how the upper-class people were being educated. We thought that was just flat out insulting, in a way, to the students and certainly not pedagogically reinforcing.”

Hadreas said advocates of using MOOCs at state schools also pay short shrift to the “digital divide” between different races and classes of students. Early into a San Jose State and Udacity pilot project that developed MOOCs for college credit, instructors realized some high school participants didn’t have computers.

“The students who had available laptops at home were clearly correlated with demographic factors,” he said. “If you look at the black students, it was somewhere in the 40 percent. If you look at Hispanic students, it was in the 50 percent. But even more correlated was the income of the family. If the family made over $80,000 it was somewhere in the 80 percent. If they made less than $30,000, it was way down in 20- or 30 percent. So the idea that one is simply going to be offering this out and the status of the student’s economic and socioeconomic background is, of course, another myth.”

The problem stems from the idea that, with MOOC courses, one size can fit all, Taiz says.

“The mistake is and the concern that we have is that, I know as this was all being launched, we saw thousands of pronouncements about how after MOOCs get rolling, there will be 10 universities in the country and there will only be five professors giving lectures,” Taiz says. “This is obviously said by someone who doesn’t understand how students learn, particularly students who are the first in their families to go to school and need a lot of hands on.”

In order for teaching to be effective, she says, it needs to reflect their diverse backgrounds and experiences.

“Good solid teaching is nimble and really able to use what goes on in students’ lives to help them get their heads wrapped around what’s going on.”

Related

Explore: ,

  • Email Post
  • Steve Carrie

    Universities faces stiff competition from many online free courses ( MOOCs ) such as udacity, edX, coursera, internship companies and programming bootcamp model companies such as Dev Bootcamp, App Academy ,AIT Learning , Many people are skipping college completely.

  • Pingback: Is Online Education Widening the Digital Divide? | EcTeach

  • Pingback: Is Online Education Widening the Digital Divide? | Education

  • Pingback: Is Online Education Widening the Digital Divide? | SevenLearning

  • Josh

    Given the few hundred Harvard students that cram Prof Sandel’s lectures, it seems highly unlikely that Prof Sandel is available for individual guidance to each student. Little point in paying close to a quarter of million USD and get bundled with a few hundred fellow rookies in a classroom!

  • deserteacher

    Wow. ‘Upstairs/downstairs.’ Well put. It has always been this way–will will let it always be? As an educator of the ‘lower classes’ for decades, I would say the world cannot afford to neglect these kids who are a wonderful, vibrant resource for the future.

    • London Moocers

      … downstairs, debt free and upwardly aspirational.

  • Brian R

    MOOCs in all their forms will develop to the point where these objections in the article can be overcome. I was a poor white trash back in the day (as poor or worse than many of my Title One studentstoday), and would have relished these opportunities being presented to students today.
    I just wish teacher’s organizations, school districts and their personnel, and state deptartments of education could get on this forward thinking distance learning bandwagon and give professional credit to teachers who finish courses. I see MOOCs as a professional development winner and moneysaver for many other professions besides teaching. Undergraduate education for all is a nice side benefit. Let’s see where this is all at in 5 years or so.

  • Ronan Mc Guire

    I can certainly appreciate what this posts brings up-income inequality is one of society’s great ills. Education is not immune to being rotted by the horrid tentacles of inequality. However, different problems face us here in Europe than on the other side of the atlantic. There is much excitement over MOOCs in the US as they stand to alleviate the huge tuition fees that are a burden to parents. In Europe, we see these MOOCs as complementing our higher education-a quality resource to broaden our knowledge (iversity.org is Europe’s answer to the US MOOC providers), as opposed to just replacing it immediately.

  • http://www.parallelbranch.com/ Parallel Branch

    I think this is a great post.Online education help the students to develop their skills and close ,collaborative relationship with their teachers.These positive interactions build the student’s confidence level.Anyway thanks for this great sharing.

  • Pingback: The Push for Online Education | CASU

  • Get Ideas on Telecommunication

    It seems true to think that online education is widening the digital divide. But, we can’t judge the future in this regard. http://onetcodeconnection.net/

  • http://tonyscarhire.com/ Car Rental

    This is such useful information for the tourist who coming
    in SLOVENIA!!!!! With the help of your blog they can easily hire any car rental
    company, good work done by you!!!!!
    Hire Car at Affordable Pric

  • Get Prepare for HRM

    Fantastic Idea!!
    If we explore this information all over the world, every lower-class people
    will be educated and complete his study as they want. http://atieducation.com/midlife-is-your-best-time-and-chance-for-a-career-change/

  • Pingback: MOOC experiments in question | Charla Bear

  • Pingback: MOOC experiments in question | Charla Bear