An iPad on Legs: Is ActivTable the Next Interactive Whiteboard?

| June 25, 2012 | 11 Comments
  • Email Post

Promethean

By Lillian Mongeau

In the race to develop the classroom of the future, tech giant Promethean has taken another step forward this year with a new product called ActivTable. Think iPad on four legs.

The newest gadget is the latest in Promethean’s range of interactive classroom products—smart boards, classroom response systems that resemble game show buzzers, teacher dashboards—and is the first of the company’s products designed especially for small group learning.

The table is about the size of a wide coffee table and comes up to the hips of the average adult. It’s a 46”, high-definition LCD touch-screen. The surface is covered in “gorilla glass” for durability. It can respond to touch from up to six kids at a time. Students stand around the table, using it for all sorts of activities, from sorting vocabulary words to working out math problems to basically anything you can think of that can also be done with paper and pencil.

And today, Promethean announced a new partnership with Houghton Mifflin Harcourt to produce Common Core-aligned math and reading curricula to be taught with their devices.

Company president Jim Marshall said the goal of bringing this product to the market is to teach kids in an environment that matches the way they live today. “[Kids] live in a digital world,” Marshall said. “If we strip that away and put them in a different learning world, those two worlds are going to be at counterpoints.”

All the activities that come with the table are aimed at four- to 11-year-old students and are designed to work best with small groups. The idea is that the table could be one of several “centers” set up in an elementary school classroom. This common teaching practice requires students to cycle around the room in small groups completing different activities at each “center.”

At a recent demonstration, the activity for the table requires students to measure angles. When that task is selected, a dozen brightly colored shapes pop up on the screen. Kids can make the shapes bigger or smaller and twist them around, but the proportions remain the same.

Each user stands at a certain spot around the table. Each spot comes with a workstation that has its own set of tools. The stations and their corresponding tools are each marked by an avatar—a  cartoon character or an uploaded photo of the actual user. This provides the basis for tracking student input.

Once the shapes are on the table, kids can pull out a protractor tool and measure the degree of the angles on each shape. Like the shapes, the protractor shrinks and grows when kids pinch their fingers together or pull them apart over the object. That part is just like an iPhone or iPad, so the interface is pretty intuitive for students.

Once the angle is measured, kids can type out the measurement on a keypad and “stick” the number to the appropriate shape. When the activity is complete and the kids are ready to turn their assignment in to the teacher, they all have to press the “OK” button in front of their spot at the table. The idea is to make sure everyone is in agreement that the project is complete and is meant to promote community-minded thinking. (Though, it doesn’t take much imagination to picture the kid who refuses to ever press “OK.”)

The table then takes a screen shot and sends it to a file for the teacher to review later. When the teacher reviews the group assignment, which she can do right away or after the kids have left for the day, she can see things like how many angles each student measured, or if all the labeling was done by one child. She can even track things like how many times a student attempted to measure an angle on the red triangle before he got it right.

“If they use a plastic protractor, that data is lost in space,” said Marshall. “If they use a digital protractor, you can pull the data.”

That data is key to gaining a better understanding of what’s happening in the classroom and to pinpointing specific kids who need help on specific skills, Marshall said. Of course, for that data to be accurate, students have to use the table correctly. Manipulating the interface is only one part of it. If a student takes out her angle-labeling tool and then everyone shares it, it’s going to look like she did all the labeling, and the other students won’t get any credit. For all that to be clear to kids, the teachers need training too, which the company offers.

As one might expect, the table isn’t cheap — at $8,000, it’s roughly the price of 16 iPads. And outfitting a classroom with the entire suite of interactive tools can run up to an additional $4,000.

So is all that money and time spent to train teachers worth it?

That’s the question teachers and administrators are asking about this and other new technologies with high price tags. What does a tech device bring to a class that a creative teacher isn’t already providing?

It’s not that tools like the ActivTable replaces creative teaching, Marshall said, it’s that they enhance creative teaching by giving teachers the tools they need in the most modern framework possible.

Karon Taver, the executive director of education technology for Ft. Worth Independent School District, said teachers report feeling that the tool was made with them in mind and that it helps them better engage their students. “Do I think technology will replace great teaching practices and great teaching?” Taver asked. “Absolutely not. My feeling has always been: ‘This is a tool for great teachers to come up with great ideas.’”

Taver said her district will be buying a few ActivTables for their special ed classrooms this year. For her, the goal is to prepare students for the future. “Honestly, can you think of a job that doesn’t use technology?” Taver said. “Even your car has computers now.”

Related

Explore: ,

  • Email Post
  • Pingback: An iPad on legs: Is ActivTable the next interactive whiteboard? | Lillian Mongeau

  • Michael Fisher

    Waste of tech money. Smart did this years ago and it was a ridiculous waste of money. Methodologies and instructional technologies should be task driven, not tool driven.

    • Ccitizen93

      Dinosaur!

    • http://karenmahon.com/ Karen Mahon

       I agree with Michael. This doesn’t really add anything new to the marketplace.  It’s just a horizontal IWB.  Hardware like this is quickly becoming commoditized.  It’s really about the instructional content and the high quality, effective content will drag hardware.  I don’t see how this table can possibly compete with tablets, on which kids can do so much more, including personalized, adaptive instructional programs.

      • Steven Parker

        You obviously haven’t seen the Activtable in person.  It comes with lots of already created content.  It’s also a better version of an interactive table than what Smart has created.  Larger, an actual table, not a box, with stunning graphics, and 16 touch points.  

        • http://karenmahon.com/ Karen Mahon

          Steven, it is true that I haven’t seen it in person. But I don’t think what you say here obviates what I said. Given the features you listed, it is still, essentially, a horizontal, multi-touch IWB that comes with content.  I’m not suggesting that kids wouldn’t think that it’s fun. I’m suggesting that it won’t contribute to any sort of fundamental shift in the ed tech space.  Nobody who can afford a one-to-one iPad implementation will opt for the Activtable instead.

          • Mgill8563

            Lets not forget we are talking about students here. It engages our students collaboratively which is important. The educator that gets this will be successful. It is how to know to use technology in the classroom. Think about it , how successful are we when we order an iPad for each student? What are you doing with this technology? Are you monitor them or do they think its just cool? With the Activtable, they have a hand sensor to see what student is participating, also reports. You can also have activities created, according to your classrooms needs. My school bought 16 of them. I am glad we did. They also will provide professional development.

          • http://www.karenmahon.com/ Karen1122

            It’s fascinating to me that your school bought 16 ActivTables!  Are you already a Promethean school?  Is there some particular orientation to your curriculum that makes the ActivTables more desirable to you?  Is your school an elementary school?

            I agree completely that it is not the technology that is important, but rather, how you use it.  I just think that tablets are more flexible and more extensible.  Of course, like anything, their use and student learning needs to be monitored, but they certainly can be used collaboratively, both in person, and at a distance, which I think these days is key.  No longer is the classroom the only place where students can (and want to) work together and a mobile solution makes this possible.  So my point is just that there is more value for money in tablets than in ActivTables and if I had to choose one over the other, I’d choose tablets.

            I’m pleased that you are happy with your purchase.  I fear that you may be uncommon in this, looking at Promethean’s Q1 and Q2 earnings and this week’s resignation of the CEO.  I think that they, like all other hardware manufacturers, may be too large to make the necessary pivot that comes with commoditization of hardward.

          • http://www.karenmahon.com/ Karen Mahon

            sorry, that last word should have been “hardware.”

    • Jamescohen Teacher

      Agreed. Promethean knows it too, they just don’t have new products to promote.  What a sinking ship! At one time they showed promise. 

  • Pingback: An iPad on Legs: Is ActivTable the Next Interactive Whiteboard? – KQED | Cheap Tables