<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:ymaps="http://api.maps.yahoo.com/Maps/V2/AnnotatedMaps.xsd" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Lowdown &#187; propositions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.kqed.org/lowdown/tag/propositions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.kqed.org/lowdown</link>
	<description>Decoding the news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 07:06:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>		<item>
		<title>Which Propositions Passed (and which counties voted for them)?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kqed.org/lowdown/2012/11/09/what-propositions-passed-and-which-counties-voted-for-them/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kqed.org/lowdown/2012/11/09/what-propositions-passed-and-which-counties-voted-for-them/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 03:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Green</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Visualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[propositions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vote count]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kqed.org/lowdown/?p=4850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let&#8217;s be honest: voting in California can be kind of overwhelming. Along with having to decide on a president, a senator, state and local officials, and local ballot measures, California voters were also faced with no less than eleven statewide propositions this election. Of these, five passed. The map below shows which counties supported what &#8230; <a href="http://blogs.kqed.org/lowdown/2012/11/09/what-propositions-passed-and-which-counties-voted-for-them/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="dropcap">L</span>et&#8217;s be honest: voting in California can be kind of overwhelming.</p>
<p>Along with having to decide on a president, a senator, state and local officials, and local ballot measures, California voters were also faced with no less than eleven statewide propositions this election. Of these, five passed.</p>
<p>The map below shows which counties supported what (counties in green voted Yes, those in red voted No). The voting patterns emphasize the fairly sharp political divide between more liberal counties in and around the Bay Area, Los Angeles and along the coast, and the far more conservative counties of the Central Valley.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://project.wnyc.org/election-2012-ca-results/embed.html#ca.propositions/30/" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" width="100%" height="705px"></iframe></p>
<p><img class="alignnone" src="http://blogs.kqed.org/election2012/files/2012/11/Screen-Shot-2012-11-07-at-8.05.54-PM-620x533.png" alt="" width="620" height="533" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kqed.org/lowdown/2012/11/09/what-propositions-passed-and-which-counties-voted-for-them/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://blogs.kqed.org/election2012/files/2012/11/Screen-Shot-2012-11-07-at-8.05.54-PM-620x533.png" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Following the Money: Who&#8217;s Paying for the Propositions?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kqed.org/lowdown/2012/10/23/following-the-money-whos-paying-for-which-proposition/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kqed.org/lowdown/2012/10/23/following-the-money-whos-paying-for-which-proposition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 16:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Green</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Visualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law & Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign contributions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data visualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[propositions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kqed.org/lowdown/?p=4233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[        <media:content url="http://blogs.kqed.org/lowdown/files/2012/10/American_Cash.jpg" medium="image" />
Individuals and organizations are spending millions in this election to win support for, or to defeat, a variety of propositions on California&#8217;s ballot. Anyone who&#8217;s watched even a smidgen of TV in the last two months can attest to the inundation of prop commercials out there. Often times, the names, affiliations, and locations of the &#8230; <a href="http://blogs.kqed.org/lowdown/2012/10/23/following-the-money-whos-paying-for-which-proposition/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
	        <media:content url="http://blogs.kqed.org/lowdown/files/2012/10/American_Cash.jpg" medium="image" />
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table>
<tr>
<td>
        <span class="dropcap">I</span>ndividuals and organizations are spending millions in this election to win support for, or to defeat, a variety of  propositions on California&#8217;s ballot. Anyone who&#8217;s watched even a smidgen of TV in the last two months can attest to the inundation of prop commercials out there. Often times, the names, affiliations, and locations of the big funders (who are oftentimes out-of-state groups) are left intentionally vague &#8211; organizations like Americans for Responsible Leadership, a conservative Arizona-based group that&#8217;s donated $11 million in favor of Prop 32. Such opaqueness makes it nearly impossible, from the ads alone, to decipher a funder&#8217;s political affiliation or long-term agenda. So, a little sleuthing can go a long way to find out who&#8217;s behind what. Bottom line: you always gotta follow the money! And the Vote&#8217;s Edge project at MapLight &#8211; a nonpartisan, nonprofit research firm &#8211; makes it pretty easy to do just that. Check out their cash flow tracking app.
      </td>
<td>
<iframe src="http://votersedge.org/california/ballot-measures/2012/november/prop-31/widget?style=&amp;position=1&amp;slideshow=1&amp;alternate_position=1" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" width="180" height="326"></iframe>
      </td>
</tr>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kqed.org/lowdown/2012/10/23/following-the-money-whos-paying-for-which-proposition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:content url="http://blogs.kqed.org/lowdown/files/2012/10/American_Cash.jpg" medium="image" height="176" width="220"><media:thumbnail url="http://blogs.kqed.org/lowdown/files/2012/10/American_Cash-60x60.jpg" height="60" width="60" /></media:content>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>KQED&#8217;s Guide to California&#8217;s Perplexing Propositions</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kqed.org/lowdown/2012/10/02/kqeds-guide-to-californias-complicated-propositions-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kqed.org/lowdown/2012/10/02/kqeds-guide-to-californias-complicated-propositions-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 06:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>KQED News Staff and Wires</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law & Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[propositions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slide shows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kqed.org/lowdown/?p=3926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ <a href="http://blogs.kqed.org/lowdown/2012/10/02/kqeds-guide-to-californias-complicated-propositions-2012/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe style="width: 100%;height: 800px;overflow: auto;border: 1px solid #999" src="http://www.kqed.org/news/politics/election2012/statepropositions-guide-embed.jsp" frameborder="0" width="320" height="240"></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kqed.org/lowdown/2012/10/02/kqeds-guide-to-californias-complicated-propositions-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
