For news hounds and conspiracy theorists alike, the past few days have been about as good as it gets.
A series of groundbreaking news stories, one published by the British paper The Guardian, the second by the The Guardian and the Washington Post, uncovered two top-secret U.S. government surveillance programs run by the National Security Agency, both aimed at collecting massive amounts of personal communications data. The findings have reignited the age-old debate over privacy and security. Civil libertarians – an interesting mix of key outspoken conservatives and liberals (yes, Rand Paul, Al Gore, and the ACLU are on the same page on this one) – expressed outrage over privacy invasions and government overreach, while President Barack Obama and a similarly unique blend of conservative and liberal government officials are defending the programs as a “critical tool” for rooting out potential terrorist activity and protecting American lives.
“You can’t have 100 percent security and also then have 100 percent privacy and zero inconvenience,” Obama told reporters on Friday. “We’re going to have to make some choices as a society.”
If you’re still a bit fuzzy on this week’s whirlwind of James Bond-esque (or, some would say, Orwellian) developments, here are a handful of good resources to help make sense of it all.
Understanding and comparing the two surveillance programs
The New York Times has a clear side-by-side comparison of the two programs, who they target, what data is collected and the companies involved in delivering it.
USA Today put together a fascinating simulation that approximates the process by which the NSA is collecting and using phone data from millions of Verizon users.
The Washington Post published a series of NSA slides explaining the PRISM data collection program, which accesses web communications information from nine different internet companies,
- Sharply contrasting editorials in two leading liberal and conservative newspapers:
- An interesting slideshow from Politico highlighting the differing positions of 20 influential politicians and pundits.
- Also from Politico, a quick video mashup of immediate reactions:
A modern history of electronic surveillance
The NY Times produced an interactive timeline of key (known) government electronic surveillance projects and milestones that began after the 9/11 terrorist attacks.
And on the lighter side …
It wouldn’t be big news if Stephen Colbert didn’t have something deliciously sarcastic to say about it.
FILED UNDER:, , , , ,
About the author
Matthew Green runs KQED’s News Education Project, a new online resource for educators and the general public to help explain the news. The project lives at kqed.org/lowdown. View all posts by Matthew Green →
Confused about grand juries? You’re probably not alone. A New York grand jury in early December voted to not criminally charge a white police officer in the choking death of Eric Garner, an unarmed black man. The decision came just … Read More
- Why California's Drought is America's Problem
- Ebola: A Collection of Multimedia Teaching Resources
President Obama’s address on Wednesday authorizing U.S. airstrikes against the Islamic State (a.k.a. ISIL or ISIS) in Syria, was a sobering reminder of the immense power bestowed on the Commander in Chief to single-handedly order military action. Like his address … Read More
- Health Map: Where You Live Can Determine How Long You Live
- Map: In Legalizing Gay Marriage, England Joins Growing International Community
The map below, created by designer/programmer Lewis Lehe, shows state-by-state felon voting laws and population impacts as reported by the The Sentencing Project, based on 2010 data. Note: among the states that deny voting rights to some felons who have … Read More
- Majority Rules: California's Proposition System Explained [Infographic]
- Bay Area Ballot Measures Relevant to Young Folks: A Youth Radio Prop Guide