Buck Stopped Here

January 3rd, 2007

BuckAt least, that's what I infer from this bit of graffiti on the fence at the end of the Berkeley Pier. My son and I biked back there yesterday, to continue pondering the possibilities of a windmill farm on the Pier. We're hoping that Berkeley will commit to providing its own mostly green energy -- possibly including windpower -- and we're calling our quest Project Quixote.

Will it happen? We don't know. We're not experts. Okay -- we're way not experts. But we want to do something about global warming -- something real -- and this is what we're trying. Plus we dig windmills.

As I mentioned in my previous blog item about this stuff, my son and I recently spent a fascinating few hours with energy expert Paul Fenn, who is a friend of my brother Jake's. Paul and his family live in the Canyon, which I believe is just outside of Berkeley (I'm really bad with geography), and they are totally "off the grid": that is, they receive no electricity from anyone. Their home is lit with kerosene lanterns, and they have no plumbing, so they use an outhouse. (Paul invited us to visit, and we plan to; I just want to fast for about 48 hours beforehand.) The prospect of raising two small children in those conditions is not one that I would wish for myself, but there's something fiercely admirable about their ability to do so.

"How do you use the telephone?" I asked.

Paul explained that the "old" phones supply their own electricity.

Indeed, whenever I've called, I've gotten this tinny, scratchy outgoing message -- it sounds as if they're using some pre-Edison equipment or something.

But even though Paul and his family live in these Luddite circumstances, it would be a drastic mistake to take him for an opt-out, antisocial, anti-government type. Paul writes laws. His "community choice" laws -- allowing each municipality to choose its own energy sources -- are the on the books in California, New Jersey, Ohio, Rhode Island, and (if I'm reading my scrawled notes correctly) Massachusetts. He's also written a bunch of energy laws for San Francisco.

"What about Berkeley?" I asked -- focused as I am on my beloved home base.

Turns out, he said, he tried five years ago to get the Berkeley city government to back his alternative-energy plan, but was unable to get anything going. And the problem right now, he explained, is that there's a window of opportunity that will soon close, due to existing power contracts. In fact, according to my notes -- which, admittedly, became especially scribblicious at this point, as we were now strolling along the Ohlone Greenway -- Berkeley may only have a year or less to act.

San Francisco recently committed to achieving 51 percent green power by 2017. And it seems to me that, given our Free Speech history and the fact that our sandals have 15 percent greater traction, we Berkeleyites ought to be able to match that.

But how? I wondered.

  • Would we need to try to pass some sort of ballot measure?

    No, Paul explained -- our city government could simply take over power-providing duties using its power of "eminent domain."

  • How might such a project be funded?

    Through bonds, which could be secured by ... (Here my notes become somewhat illegible -- possibly a byproduct of the grand mal-type seizures that begin to afflict me whenever anyone starts using words like "fiscal." I realize that this is something that I must get over, if I am to be any sort of a citizenly mensch.) Well, let's just say "bonds" for the moment, and leave it at that.

  • Could all the energy be provided by windmills?

    No -- only about a third (which is a lot, actually!). The rest could be provided by other technologies -- for example, something called a solar concentrator, supplemented by a hybrid steam-gas turbine.

  • Might the windmills be a hazard for birds (as I'd heard somewhere)?

    This, it turns out, was a major concern when Paul approached the Berkeley folks several years ago. He says that there are a variety of windmill designs, and some are bird-friendly.

  • Could Berkeley really do this on its own? (Generating your own power seems like a really big deal.)

    Yes it could, he said. But even better would be a collaboration between, say, Berkeley, Oakland, Richmond, Vallejo, and Emeryville. He explained that it's best to have a wide variety of energy consumers: some residential, some industrial, etc. With several East Bay cities banding together, you could have a nicely diverse assortment of electricity-users.

As Paul drove off in his biofueled car, I thought: Phew! So this is the kind of stuff the grownups have been dealing with all my life!

Pier ViewAnd a couple days later, as my son and I stood on the Berkeley Pier, near the spot where Buck had once stopped and made his mark, I felt giddy -- with excitement at the possibilities, with fear of failure, and with awe at the beauty of this place.

I can just follow my instincts and do my best. Let's see what happens.

Entry Filed under: citizenship,let's digress,project quixote

3 Comments

  • 1. Tom  |  January 9th, 2007 at 3:06 pm

    Josh, I liked this post. I lean considerably more right than you would be comfortable with, but I consider myself an environmentalist conservative. That’s usually an oxymoron, I know, but bear with me.

    I appreciate that there are folks out there putting their money where their mouth is. It’s one thing to sit pensively and wait for the rest of the world to do to the conserving. To forsake modern conveniences before a government edict demands it is commendable.

    I’m with you; I couldn’t envision living in such conditions, but there certainly must be a halfway point between life as a Luddite and life as a typical, American energy hog.

    I haven’t checked in for a while and need to catch up on your posts. Hoping and praying you make a Twin Cities stop on a future tour.

  • 2. Josh Kornbluth  |  January 13th, 2007 at 11:08 am

    Hey, Tom — It’s so heartening to get your comment! Liberal, radical, conservative — we’re all in the same boat, and the seas are rising.

  • 3. rene  |  June 14th, 2008 at 10:40 pm

    Build a wind farm on Berkeley Pier…. not such a good idea. I am an avid fisherman and frequent BP from time to time. I can’t imagine the sound of those blades swooshing every 2 seconds… and then to get a nervous breakdown from the shade/sunshine intervals…. and then to have a huge windmill block the views and land/sea scape.

    Put one one on the Berkely Flats or somewhere along 80 for all I care… but to put one right on the pier is someting I would be against. Remember the FUNCTION of a pier… a fishing pier…. it might not align with your plans.

    And stop biking on that pier


KQED
Watch Mondays at 7:30pm
Comcast On Demand & KQED 191
email reminder Sign-up for email reminders

Calendar

January 2007
M T W T F S S
« Dec   Feb »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

Most Recent Posts


The opinions expressed on
The Josh Kornbluth Show blog
are those of the author and not necessarily those of KQED.