<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Check, Please! Bay Area: Episode 9 (#109)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.kqed.org/food/2006/02/09/check-please-bay-area-episode-9-109/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.kqed.org/food/2006/02/09/check-please-bay-area-episode-9-109/</link>
	<description>Restaurant Reviews by Bay Area Foodies</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: KR</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kqed.org/food/2006/02/09/check-please-bay-area-episode-9-109/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>KR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2006 20:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mail1.kqed.org/wpmu/food/2006/02/09/check-please-bay-area-episode-9-109/#comment-168</guid>
		<description>I too would like a honest review but you can say the same thing  without hyperbole.
A "Not worth the effort to travel" or "not good value for money" or "The fish was overcooked  ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[I too would like a honest review but you can say the same thing  without hyperbole.
A "Not worth the effort to travel" or "not good value for money" or "The fish was overcooked  ...]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KT</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kqed.org/food/2006/02/09/check-please-bay-area-episode-9-109/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>KT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 22:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mail1.kqed.org/wpmu/food/2006/02/09/check-please-bay-area-episode-9-109/#comment-167</guid>
		<description>I felt that this was the most interesting episode of Check, Please! I have seen thus far. I have been bored during previous shows where everyone agrees on everything. Some healthy, constructive debate is much ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[I felt that this was the most interesting episode of Check, Please! I have seen thus far. I have been bored during previous shows where everyone agrees on everything. Some healthy, constructive debate is much ...]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: km</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kqed.org/food/2006/02/09/check-please-bay-area-episode-9-109/#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator>km</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 01:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mail1.kqed.org/wpmu/food/2006/02/09/check-please-bay-area-episode-9-109/#comment-166</guid>
		<description>I've been to both Pisces and Aziza.  Unfortunately, Pisces' food has really slipped since 2003, but I wouldn't characterize it as 'pathetic' as that horrible Gregory did.  Their moule frites (mussels and fries) ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[I've been to both Pisces and Aziza.  Unfortunately, Pisces' food has really slipped since 2003, but I wouldn't characterize it as 'pathetic' as that horrible Gregory did.  Their moule frites (mussels and fries) ...]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lmk</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kqed.org/food/2006/02/09/check-please-bay-area-episode-9-109/#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator>lmk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 04:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mail1.kqed.org/wpmu/food/2006/02/09/check-please-bay-area-episode-9-109/#comment-165</guid>
		<description>This episode saddened me.  It reduced Check, Please! to Jerry Springer for Foodies. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[This episode saddened me.  It reduced Check, Please! to Jerry Springer for Foodies. ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KR</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kqed.org/food/2006/02/09/check-please-bay-area-episode-9-109/#comment-164</link>
		<dc:creator>KR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 21:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mail1.kqed.org/wpmu/food/2006/02/09/check-please-bay-area-episode-9-109/#comment-164</guid>
		<description>I enjoy the program greatly. It is fun to live vicariously even if you do not plan to visit all the great food finds in the bay area.

Episode 9 was irritating.

Especially Gregory - the food ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[I enjoy the program greatly. It is fun to live vicariously even if you do not plan to visit all the great food finds in the bay area.

Episode 9 was irritating.

Especially Gregory - the food ...]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KS</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kqed.org/food/2006/02/09/check-please-bay-area-episode-9-109/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>KS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2006 02:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mail1.kqed.org/wpmu/food/2006/02/09/check-please-bay-area-episode-9-109/#comment-163</guid>
		<description>This show is my new favorite and I have yet to miss an episode. I hope you will keep the tone civil, shouting matches are not the best way to discuss good food.
   ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[This show is my new favorite and I have yet to miss an episode. I hope you will keep the tone civil, shouting matches are not the best way to discuss good food.
   ...]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
