<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>KQED&#039;s Climate Watch &#187; WIPP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/tag/wipp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch</link>
	<description>KQED&#039;s multimedia series providing in-depth coverage of climate-related science and policy issues from a California perspective.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 20:37:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://kqed.superfeedr.com"/>		<item>
		<title>Yes, In Our Backyard</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2011/07/26/yes-in-our-backyard-2/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2011/07/26/yes-in-our-backyard-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 05:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Miller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government & Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WIPP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/?p=14274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After more than a decade with a nuclear waste dump next door, the sky has not fallen on Carlsbad, New Mexico. <a href="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2011/07/26/yes-in-our-backyard-2/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>After more than a decade with a nuclear waste dump next door, the sky has not fallen on Carlsbad</strong></p>
<p>Okay, so Yucca Mountain hasn&#8217;t worked out so well. In fact, the current betting is that the planned Nevada repository for nuclear waste will never open its doors. No matter. New Mexico beckons.</p>
<div id="attachment_14282"  class="wp-caption module image left" style="width: 300px;"><a rel="attachment wp-att-14282" href="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2011/07/26/yes-in-our-backyard-2/blog_3257/"><img class="size-full wp-image-14282" title="blog_3257" src="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/files/2011/07/blog_3257.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a><p class="wp-media-credit">Craig Miller</p><p class="wp-caption-text">A transport container for nuclear waste, outside the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant in New Mexico.</p></div>
<p>Few Americans seem to realize that the world&#8217;s only functioning geologic repository for nuclear waste of any kind is already open for business in the southeastern corner of New Mexico. In fact, the <a title="DOE - WIPP" href="http://www.wipp.energy.gov/" target="_blank">Waste Isolation Pilot Plant</a> is well beyond the &#8220;pilot&#8221; phase. It&#8217;s been taking in truckloads of the stuff since 1999, without mishap, it&#8217;s success no doubt a factor in its anonymity.</p>
<p>An average of 30 truckloads a week from all corners of the US, roll into what is essentially a glorified salt mine, licensed by the federal government to accept low-level <a title="ANS - Transuranics" href="http://www.aboutnuclear.org/view.cgi?fC=Waste,Types_of_Radioactive_Waste,Transuranic_Waste" target="_blank">&#8220;transuranic&#8221; waste</a> from defense-related facilities only.</p>
<p>The waste is &#8220;isolated&#8221; 2,000 feet below ground in the saline remains of the vast <a title="UCB - Permian " href="http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/permian/permian.html" target="_blank">Permian Sea</a> that covered the region more than 200 million years ago.</p>
<p><object id="soundslider" width="620" height="533"><param name="movie" value="http://www.kqed.org/assets/slideshow/CW_WIPP_SS/soundslider.swf?size=1&amp;format=xml" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="quality" value="high" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="menu" value="false" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="620" height="533" src="http://www.kqed.org/assets/slideshow/CW_WIPP_SS/soundslider.swf?size=1&amp;format=xml" quality="high" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" allowscriptaccess="sameDomain" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>On a recent tour of the underground tunnels or &#8220;drifts&#8221; where the waste is entombed,  my guide, Bobby St. John, picked up a marble-sized salt crystal and pointed to a tiny bubble trapped inside. &#8220;That right there,&#8221; he said, &#8220;is a 230-million-year-old drop of water.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s about the only water in evidence, part of what makes this a promising place to put away radioactive cast-offs for good. The other is the virtual absence of seismic potential, something that has dogged proponents of Yucca Mountain.</p>
<p>You can tag along on my tour by listening to the radio report that accompanies this post, airing on <a title="TCR - main" href="http://www.californiareport.org/archive/R201107270850/a" target="_blank"><em>The California Report</em></a> as the final installment of our three-part series on the nuclear waste dilemma. You can also watch a <a title="PBS - Need to Know" href="http://www.pbs.org/wnet/need-to-know/environment/video-a-solution-for-nuclear-waste/10611/" target="_blank">video segment</a> on WIPP produced by the PBS program <em>Need to Know</em>.</p>
<p><em>Tune in to the companion radio series: <a title="TCR - story" href="http://www.californiareport.org/archive/R201107250850/a">Part 1: California&#8217;s nuclear waste profile.</a> <a title="TCR - story" href="http://www.californiareport.org/archive/R201107260850/a">Part 2 (Tue): What we can learn from Sweden. </a><a title="TCR - story" href="http://www.californiareport.org/archive/R201107270850/a">Part 3 (Wed): The town that said: &#8220;Yes, in our back yard.&#8221;</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2011/07/26/yes-in-our-backyard-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/files/2011/07/blog_3257.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">blog_3257</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
