<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>KQED&#039;s Climate Watch &#187; wilderness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/tag/wilderness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch</link>
	<description>KQED&#039;s multimedia series providing in-depth coverage of climate-related science and policy issues from a California perspective.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 20:37:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://kqed.superfeedr.com"/>		<item>
		<title>Possible Detour on the &#8220;Electron Superhighway&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2009/03/25/possible-detour-on-the-electron-superhighway/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2009/03/25/possible-detour-on-the-electron-superhighway/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 00:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Climate Watch Correspondent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government & Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Desert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mojave desert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wilderness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/?p=616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It appears that almost 200,000 acres of Mojave Desert will be under federal wilderness protection and Senator Dianne Feinstein is eyeing almost a million more acres in the region.  If energy companies can’t build on that land, it follows that they’ll try to build it in the land that’s left. And that’s got a lot of people who live in the unprotected areas of the Mojave worried.
 <a href="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2009/03/25/possible-detour-on-the-electron-superhighway/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-617" src="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/files/2009/03/electwr_blog.jpg" alt="electwr_blog" width="240" height="180" /></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">It appears that almost 200,000 acres of Mojave Desert will be under federal wilderness protection now that Congress passed the Omnibus Land Management Act of 2009.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Much more was set aside throughout California, as I report in my radio story for <a href="http://www.californiareport.org/"><em>The California Report</em></a>.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Now, Senator Dianne Feinstein is eyeing almost a million additional acres in the Mojave off of old Route 66 between Ludlow and Needles.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">There are currently 163 proposed renewable energy projects for federal lands in the Mojave Desert region. Nineteen of them are slated for the land <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-desert25-2009mar25,0,6168582.story">Senator Feinstein wants to set aside</a>. If energy companies can’t build on that land, it follows that they’ll try to build it in the land that’s left.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">And that’s got a lot of people who live in the unprotected areas of the Mojave worried. Not only are most of the state’s large-scale renewable energy projects planned for this region, but as I explored in a recent <a href="http://www.kqed.org/news/climatewatch/specialseries/gridlock.jsp">two-part series for Climate Watch</a>, there’s also a transmission corridor in the works to carry that power to Los Angeles.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Use the player below to listen to my conversation with Jim Harvey, who heads the <a href="http://www.allianceforresponsibleenergypolicy.com/">Alliance for Responsible Energy Policy</a>, about what all of this new land protection means for environmentalists like him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2009/03/25/possible-detour-on-the-electron-superhighway/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/files/2009/03/jimharvey-blog2.mp3" length="5359071" type="audio/mpeg" />
	
		<media:content url="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/files/2009/03/electwr_blog.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">electwr_blog</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
