<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>KQED&#039;s Climate Watch &#187; The Nature Conservancy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/tag/the-nature-conservancy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch</link>
	<description>KQED&#039;s multimedia series providing in-depth coverage of climate-related science and policy issues from a California perspective.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 20:37:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://kqed.superfeedr.com"/>		<item>
		<title>Hopenhagen II: A Delegate&#8217;s View</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2009/12/07/hopenhagen-ii-a-delegates-view/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2009/12/07/hopenhagen-ii-a-delegates-view/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 05:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Miller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government & Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COP 15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copenhagen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Nature Conservancy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/?p=3739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A California delegate finds hope and substance at the start of the climate convention. <a href="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2009/12/07/hopenhagen-ii-a-delegates-view/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Louis Blumberg is a COP 15 delegate and Director of Climate and Forest Policy for the Nature<br />
Conservancy in California.</em></p>
<p><strong>Update from Hopenhagen</strong></p>
<p>By Louis Blumberg</p>
<p>The sense of possibility pervaded the halls Monday, infusing energy and  optimism into the delegates at the UN climate change conference in  Copenhagen, Denmark. As in prior years, the sheer magnitude of the event  was inspiring. More than 10,000 participants attended today, thousands  of whom (including this participant) waited patiently in line for hours  to get inside.</p>
<p>In one room, representatives from 192 nations sat shoulder-to-shoulder  in the discussions, and each country was given an equal voice. Two seats  were allocated to Gabon and two for the U.S., two for China and two for  Monaco, and so on.</p>
<p>At home in San Francisco, much of my work is focused on addressing  climate change in California, and we have made great progress as a  state. Now, seeing the whole world gathered in one room (figuratively  speaking), it is a powerful reminder that the work we are doing in  California can be applied anywhere, whether in Australia, Peru or China.  We are all in this together and can learn so much from one another.</p>
<p>This is the 15th meeting for the &#8220;Conference of Parties&#8221; (hence &#8220;COP 15&#8243;), a follow-up to  the 1992 UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, which resulted in the first global climate agreement ratified by 192 nations, including the U.S. Each year preceding that conference, global delegations have  met to discuss how to address climate change. The most notable agreement  happened in 1997 in Kyoto, Japan. Dubbed the Kyoto Protocol, it  ordered 37 industrialized nations to cut greenhouse gas emissions. The  U.S. rejected that pact, and since then our federal government has shown little-to-no leadership on the issue.</p>
<p>But what a difference a year makes. In its first public statement at the  conference, the United States addressed two key issues head-on with commitments for action: First, a pledge to reduce emissions of  greenhouse gases by 17% by 2020; and second, a $10 billion pledge with  other nations intended to help developing countries grow their economies  while cutting emissions. U.S. envoy Jonathan Pershing spoke forcefully,  signaling that a new regime in Washington meant real leadership on  climate change for the world.</p>
<p>Despite public skepticism, it has become clear that something is going  to happen here. People from all over the world have come together to solve the most serious problem of our lifetime. Nothing less than the  future of nature and humanity is at stake. I just hope the agreement is  sufficiently strong and that action happens quickly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2009/12/07/hopenhagen-ii-a-delegates-view/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
