<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>KQED&#039;s Climate Watch &#187; Sacramento</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/tag/sacramento/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch</link>
	<description>KQED&#039;s multimedia series providing in-depth coverage of climate-related science and policy issues from a California perspective.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 20:37:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://kqed.superfeedr.com"/>		<item>
		<title>The Cruel Paradox of Water Conservation</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2011/06/14/the-cruel-paradox-of-water-conservation/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2011/06/14/the-cruel-paradox-of-water-conservation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Miller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Bay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EBMUD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sacramento]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/?p=13437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The more we conserve, the more it costs. <a href="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2011/06/14/the-cruel-paradox-of-water-conservation/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The more we conserve, the more it costs  :-/</strong></p>
<p>The cost of water could soon rise for more than a million people in East Bay communities of the San Francisco Bay Area.</p>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-13441" href="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2011/06/14/the-cruel-paradox-of-water-conservation/water_87614994/"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-13441" title="water_87614994" src="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/files/2011/06/water_87614994.jpg" alt="" width="230" height="207" /></a>Tonight the <a title="EBMUD - main" href="http://www.ebmud.com/">East Bay Municipal Utility District</a> (EBMUD) will consider a six-percent price hike for this fiscal year.</p>
<p>(UPDATE: District directors <a title="BC - story" href="http://ht.ly/5iRCl">approved the increase</a> unanimously)</p>
<p>Water <a title="Riverside PE - story" href="http://www.pe.com/localnews/corona/stories/PE_News_Local_D_wrates17.275e3af.html">districts around the state</a> are also <a title="Marin Patch - post" href="http://millvalley.patch.com/articles/mmwd-board-approves-water-rate-hike">increasing rates</a> as customers conserve water.</p>
<p>“It’s a horrible conundrum,&#8221; admits Herb Niederberger, a division chief at the Sacramento County Department of Water Resources. &#8220;The more you conserve, the better it is for the utility, but at the same time, less revenue is generated and in order to cover costs you have to raise rates.”</p>
<p>The Sacramento agency and EBMUD are completing a regional water-supply project.<br />
EBMUD is also contemplating another six-percent hike next fiscal year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2011/06/14/the-cruel-paradox-of-water-conservation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/files/2011/06/water_87614994.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">water_87614994</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
