<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>KQED&#039;s Climate Watch &#187; poll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/tag/poll/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch</link>
	<description>KQED&#039;s multimedia series providing in-depth coverage of climate-related science and policy issues from a California perspective.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 20:37:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://kqed.superfeedr.com"/>		<item>
		<title>Poll: Support for Climate Action More Contentious</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2009/07/29/poll-support-for-climate-action-more-contentious/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2009/07/29/poll-support-for-climate-action-more-contentious/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 04:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Miller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government & Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/?p=2192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite the recession, the state budget crisis, and you-name-it, Californians cling doggedly to their climate priorities--well, most of them. <a href="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2009/07/29/poll-support-for-climate-action-more-contentious/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New polling suggests that Californians may be wavering slightly in their support of climate response policies. <a title="PPIC report" href="http://www.ppic.org/main/event.asp?i=962">The survey</a>, just released by the non-partisan <a title="PPIC main" href="http://www.ppic.org/main/home.asp">Public Policy Institute of California</a> (PPIC), also shows a growing rift along party lines, when it comes to climate policy.</p>
<p>Nearly nine in ten Democrats surveyed (86%) said the government should regulate greenhouse gas emissions, while just 54% of Republicans agreed. Among all adults, including &#8220;independent&#8221; voters, 76% of Californians favored regulation of emissions, similar to a nationwide poll conducted in June by ABC News and the Washington Post.</p>
<p>PPIC chief Mark Baldassare says he thinks that the high-profile debate over national carbon legislation is &#8220;splitting Democrats and Republicans in California in a way that they weren&#8217;t a couple of years ago, when they saw a Republican governor and a Democratic legislature finding common ground on climate issues.&#8221;</p>
<p>Baldassare also observed that the relentless recession and state budget crisis have distracted both voters and their political leaders from environmental concerns.</p>
<p>There was a spike in water concerns compared to last year&#8217;s poll, with 18% naming water supply and drought as the state&#8217;s most important environmental issue, up 13 points from a year ago, virtually tying air pollution and vehicle emissions (20%) as the top concern. The poll&#8217;s margin of error is 2%. The telephone survey was conducted in mid-July.</p>
<p>The PPIC poll also appeared to pick up a groundswell among climate action naysayers. The percentage of respondents saying there&#8217;s no need for immediate action was up six points from a year ago, to 23%. Baldassare chalks this up partly to the complex nature of climate science. &#8220;People become skeptical when they don&#8217;t understand things,&#8221; he said.</p>
<p>Overall respondents showed the most concern (59%) over the likelihood of more wildfires, followed by more severe droughts (55%). People seemed less concerned about flooding and coastal erosion brought about by rising sea levels, possibly because they see that as a longer-term threat. Concern over wildfire was strongest in the Inland Empire and L.A. Basin. Interestingly, Angelinos also expressed more intense drought fears (61%) than respondents in the ag-intensive Central Valley, where just 21% described themselves as &#8220;very concerned&#8221; about the drought threat from climate change. Note that this is not an expression of drought fears in general, just those driven by climate change.</p>
<p>When it came down to the question of what to do about global warming, more Californians favored a &#8220;carbon tax&#8221; than a cap-and-trade system, by 56% to 49%. California and the nation are currently on a path toward cap-and-trade, at least partly (and paradoxically) because it&#8217;s considered more politically palatable than a straightforward carbon tax.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2009/07/29/poll-support-for-climate-action-more-contentious/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
