<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>KQED&#039;s Climate Watch &#187; polar bear</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/tag/polar-bear/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch</link>
	<description>KQED&#039;s multimedia series providing in-depth coverage of climate-related science and policy issues from a California perspective.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 20:37:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://kqed.superfeedr.com"/>		<item>
		<title>Author: Polar Bears Doomed No Matter What We Do</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2009/12/10/a-rare-for-us-polar-bear-post/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2009/12/10/a-rare-for-us-polar-bear-post/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 03:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Miller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government & Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coastal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cryosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecosystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oceans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polar bear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wildlife]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/?p=3851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An hour-long interview might seem like more than you'd ever want to know about polar bears--until you hear it. <a href="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2009/12/10/a-rare-for-us-polar-bear-post/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_3859"  class="wp-caption module image alignleft" style="width: 300px;"><img class="size-full wp-image-3859" title="polar.bear_USFWS" src="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/files/2009/12/polar.bear_USFWS.jpg" alt="US Fish &amp; Wildlife Service" width="300" height="233" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Photo: US Fish &amp; Wildlife Service</p></div>
<p>Because our charter at Climate Watch is to examine climate change from the California perspective, you don&#8217;t see a lot here about melting ice caps and imperiled polar bears. But Michael Krasny&#8217;s <a title="KQED - Forum" href="http://www.kqed.org/epArchive/R912101000">interview with Richard Ellis</a> on KQED&#8217;s <em>Forum</em> program is well worth an hour of your time.</p>
<p>Ellis is the author of <a title="Random House - title" href="http://www.randomhouse.com/catalog/display.pperl?isbn=9780307270597"><em>On Thin Ice: The Changing             World of the Polar Bear</em></a> (Random House, 2009) and it&#8217;s fair to say that he managed to stun Krasny with a declaration that the species is &#8220;doomed,&#8221; no matter what we might try to do to save it at this point. Ellis says there is already too much warming in the pipeline (what scientists call &#8220;committed&#8221; warming) to reverse the disintegration of the bears&#8217; arctic habitat.</p>
<p>Polar bear populations have been a topic of persistent confusion, recently amplified in an <a title="WP - Palin op-ed" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/12/08/AR2009120803402.html">op-ed piece</a> written by former Alaska governor Sarah Palin for <em>The Washington Post</em>.</p>
<p>According to the advocacy group <a title="Polar Bears Intl - main" href="http://www.polarbearsinternational.org">Polar Bears International</a>, there is little room for doubt about the animal&#8217;s decline. The organization&#8217;s website <a title="PBI - population" href="http://www.polarbearsinternational.org/ask-the-experts/population/">breaks down the numbers</a>, which point to a &#8220;scientifically documented decline in the best-studied population, Western Hudson Bay, and predictions of decline in the second best-studied population, the Southern Beaufort Sea.&#8221;</p>
<p>The PBI analysis goes on to explain that:</p>
<blockquote><p>The Western Hudson Bay population has dropped by 22% since 1987. The Southern Beaufort Sea bears are showing the same signs of stress the Western Hudson Bay bears did before they crashed, including smaller adults and fewer yearling bears.</p>
<p>At the most recent meeting of the IUCN Polar Bear Specialist Group (Copenhagen, 2009), scientists reported that of the 19 sub-populations of polar bears, eight are declining, three are stable, one is increasing, and seven have insufficient data on which to base a decision. (The number of declining populations has increased from five at the group&#8217;s 2005 meeting.)</p></blockquote>
<p>Regardless of whether you share the conclusions of Ellis and PBI about the future of the &#8220;poster child for global warming,&#8221; the <em>Forum</em> interview is a fascinating hour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2009/12/10/a-rare-for-us-polar-bear-post/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/files/2009/12/polar.bear_USFWS.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">polar.bear_USFWS</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
