<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>KQED&#039;s Climate Watch &#187; plug-in</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/tag/plug-in/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch</link>
	<description>KQED&#039;s multimedia series providing in-depth coverage of climate-related science and policy issues from a California perspective.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 20:37:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://kqed.superfeedr.com"/>		<item>
		<title>What Shade of Green is Your Ride?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2011/05/25/what-shade-of-green-is-your-ride/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2011/05/25/what-shade-of-green-is-your-ride/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 03:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lauren Sommer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government & Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electric vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuel economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fuel efficiency standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse gas emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plug-in]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/?p=13085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New Car Labels Emphasize Emissions and Savings. <a href="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2011/05/25/what-shade-of-green-is-your-ride/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>New Car Labels Emphasize Emissions and Savings</strong></p>
<div id="attachment_13093"  class="wp-caption module image alignleft" style="width: 360px;"><a rel="attachment wp-att-13093" href="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2011/05/25/what-shade-of-green-is-your-ride/electric-sticker/"><img class="size-full wp-image-13093 " title="electric-sticker" src="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/files/2011/05/electric-sticker.jpg" alt="" width="360" height="236" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Coming to a showroom near you: a new fuel economy sticker for an electric vehicle. (Photo: Lauren Sommer)</p></div>
<p>Buy a gas guzzler and you might discover a new form of &#8220;sticker shock.&#8221;</p>
<p>Cars and trucks sitting on dealership lots will soon have a new fuel economy sticker in the window. Today, the Environmental Protection Agency released <a href="http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/label/index.shtml">newly-designed labels</a> that emphasize environmental performance for conventional and electric cars.</p>
<p>The label might seem familiar to California drivers. In 2008, <a href="http://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/labeling/labeling.htm">the state released its own environmental impact sticker</a> for new cars. It rates a car&#8217;s smog and greenhouse gas emissions on a scale of one to ten.</p>
<p>The new national label follows California&#8217;s lead and incorporates the same rating system. But for the first time, it will also display the annual fuel cost for a vehicle, comparing it to an average vehicle over five years.</p>
<p>EPA regional administrator Jared Blumenfeld announced the new labels in the Silicon Valley showroom of electric car maker <a href="http://www.teslamotors.com/">Tesla</a>. He says as plug-in hybrid and electric cars started appearing on the market, it became clear that the old sticker wouldn&#8217;t cut it. &#8220;This label really allows a consumer to compare a gasoline vehicle to an electric vehicle for the first time.&#8221;</p>
<p>Blumenfeld says he expects the labels to make a difference in areas populated by early adopters of EVs. &#8220;Los Angeles and San Francisco are in the top three of hybrid purchases in the nation. People are already starting to buy these alternative vehicles in large numbers.&#8221;</p>
<p>Since electric cars don&#8217;t use gas, their energy use is displayed in &#8220;miles per gallon equivalent&#8221;, which the government calculates by assuming a gallon of gasoline is equal to 33.7 kilowatt-hours of electricity.</p>
<p>For Tesla&#8217;s Roadster sports car, that pencils out to 119 miles per &#8220;gallon&#8221; and a $9,900 fuel savings over five years, compared to an average car.</p>
<div id="attachment_13102"  class="wp-caption module image alignright" style="width: 360px;"><a rel="attachment wp-att-13102" href="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2011/05/25/what-shade-of-green-is-your-ride/gasguzzler/"><img class="size-full wp-image-13102 " title="gasguzzler" src="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/files/2011/05/gasguzzler.jpg" alt="" width="360" height="227" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">A new label for a gas guzzler. (Photo: Lauren Sommer)</p></div>
<p>Of course, when it comes to greenhouse gas emissions, electric cars are only as clean as the electricity they use. Electric cars in coal states are responsible for more emissions than in states that generate a lot of renewable power.</p>
<p>To estimate greenhouse gas emissions, the EPA took an average of the energy source mix across the country. But in a press conference, EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson emphasized <a href="http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/label/calculator.jsp">a new tool</a> that consumers could use to &#8220;drill down&#8221; to their part of the country.</p>
<p>Crunch some numbers and the differences are pretty stark. A Nissan Leaf that&#8217;s charged in San Francisco produces 120 grams of CO2 per mile, <a href="http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/label/calculator.jsp">according to the calculator</a>. That same Nissan Leaf in Indianapolis, Indiana generates 270 grams of CO2 per mile.</p>
<p>One more number to note: in the US, consumers are accustomed to seeing miles per gallon. For the first time, the new labels also include gallons per 100 miles.  <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/06/080619142118.htm">Research has shown</a> that &#8220;gallons per mile&#8221; is a much easier to understand when it comes to fuel economy.</p>
<p>One example: You might assume the difference between a 40-mpg and 30-mpg car is about the same as the difference between 30-and-20-mpg. Flip those numbers around to gallons used per 10,000 miles and the picture becomes a little clearer. A 40-mpg ride saves 83 gallons over one that gets 30 mpg. But the difference between 30-and 20-mpg is 167 gallons.</p>
<p>The new stickers will appear on model-year 2013 cars and trucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2011/05/25/what-shade-of-green-is-your-ride/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:content url="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/files/2011/05/electric-sticker.jpg" medium="image" height="262" width="400"><media:thumbnail url="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/files/2011/05/electric-sticker-60x60.jpg" height="60" width="60" /></media:content>
		<media:content url="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/files/2011/05/electric-sticker.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">electric-sticker</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/files/2011/05/gasguzzler.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">gasguzzler</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Plugged In, in Long Beach</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2009/08/13/plugged-in-in-long-beach/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2009/08/13/plugged-in-in-long-beach/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 00:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Climate Watch Correspondent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electric vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plug-in]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/?p=2478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Chevy that gets 230 miles to the gallon. A Hummer that gets 100. Plug-in 2009, the 2nd annual industry conference in Long Beach, was wall-to-wall with such apparent oxymora. <a href="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2009/08/13/plugged-in-in-long-beach/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Rob Schmitz heads KQED&#8217;s Los Angeles Bureau and is a frequent contributor to Climate Watch.</em></p>
<p>A Chevy that gets 230 miles to the gallon. A Hummer that gets 100.</p>
<p><a title="Plug-in 2009 - main" href="http://www.plugin2009.com/">Plug-in 2009</a>, the 2nd annual industry conference in Long Beach, was wall-to-wall with such apparent oxymora. Just  roving around the exhibition floor on Tuesday, I got the sense that our electric  vehicle future is closer than I had originally suspected. I spoke to  conference-goers who are already investing millions in what is assured to be an  enormous infrastructure that’ll be built around these new cars.</p>
<div id="attachment_2481"  class="wp-caption module image aligncenter" style="width: 415px;"><img class="size-full wp-image-2481" title="plug_0189_blog1" src="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/files/2009/08/plug_0189_blog1.jpg" alt="Electric Vehicle Charging Stations that are sold by Coulomb Technologies out of the Silicon Valley. Photo: Rob Schmitz" width="415" height="311" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Electric vehicle charging stations from Campbell-based Coulomb Technologies. Photo: Rob Schmitz</p></div>
<p>I met Tom  Tormey, Vice President of Technology at the Silicon Valley-based <a title="Coulomb Tech - main" href="http://www.coulombtech.com/">Coulomb  Technologies</a>. He raised a lot of important questions about where we’d charge  these vehicles when we’re not at home. Of course, the answer came in the form of  something he could sell you: car-charging stations. His company manufactures  automated posts where you can use a credit card to charge up your car when you’re away  from home or at work. He’s already sold dozens of these to cities across Europe.  The stations will even help calculate taxes for the government through a network  that hooks up to Coulomb’s servers here in California: a potentially big business  for an electric future.</p>
<p>Speaking of big, check out the electric Hummer. If you thought this beast was nearing extinction (with the sale of  Hummer to the Chinese and all), think again. With a new electric version  that allegedly gets a 100 miles to the gallon, you may continue to see this American icon on  our freeways.</p>
<div id="attachment_2482"  class="wp-caption module image aligncenter" style="width: 415px;"><img class="size-full wp-image-2482" title="plug_0184_blog" src="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/files/2009/08/plug_0184_blog.jpg" alt="Jim Spellman of Raser Technologies, standing in front of the 100-mpg Electric Hummer. Photo: Rob Schmitz" width="415" height="311" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Jim Spellman of Raser Technologies, standing in front of the 100-mpg electric Hummer. Photo: Rob Schmitz</p></div>
<p>Jim Spellman of <a title="Raser Technologies - main" href="http://www.rasertech.com/">Raser Technologies</a> showed off the Hummer to me,  complete with his company’s power train and electric generation system. He says  they took it out for a <a title="Raser - Hummer test" href="http://www.rasertech.com/media/videos/test-drive">test drive</a> a few weeks ago and it ran 50 miles on  electric power with 30% of the battery left to go.</p>
<p>With momentum building among the plug-in players, it&#8217;s not surprising that Mike Howard of the Electric Power Research Institute predicts there will be 16 million electric vehicles on the nation’s roads by 2030.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2009/08/13/plugged-in-in-long-beach/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/files/2009/08/plug_0189_blog1.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">plug_0189_blog1</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/files/2009/08/plug_0184_blog.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">plug_0184_blog</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
