<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>KQED&#039;s Climate Watch &#187; Nunes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/tag/nunes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch</link>
	<description>KQED&#039;s multimedia series providing in-depth coverage of climate-related science and policy issues from a California perspective.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 20:37:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://kqed.superfeedr.com"/>		<item>
		<title>New Battlefront Over California Water</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2011/06/02/new-battlefront-over-california-water/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2011/06/02/new-battlefront-over-california-water/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 21:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Miller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/?p=13186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A controversial bill would ensure water for Central Valley farms -- but at what cost?

 <a href="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2011/06/02/new-battlefront-over-california-water/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Garamendi warns of a &#8220;serious water war&#8221; if Nunes bill passes</strong></p>
<p>Lawmakers traded punches on Capitol Hill this morning over the future of California&#8217;s water.</p>
<div id="attachment_13192"  class="wp-caption module image alignleft" style="width: 298px;"><a rel="attachment wp-att-13192" href="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2011/06/02/new-battlefront-over-california-water/farmers-describe-irrigation-costs-benefits-labor-costs-may-offset-water-savings-of-sprinkler-systems/"><img class="size-full wp-image-13192" title="Farmers describe irrigation costs, benefits …: Labor costs may offset water savings of sprinkler systems" src="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/files/2011/06/img5001p11a_UC_sm.jpg" alt="" width="298" height="215" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">(Photo: University of California)</p></div>
<p>In a contentious hearing before the House Subcommittee on Water &amp; Power, Delta Democrat John Garamendi warned that a Republican-sponsored bill to ensure farm water in the Central Valley would start a &#8220;serious water war.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Are you guys kidding?&#8221;, Garamendi asked his congressional colleagues. &#8220;You really want to start a serious water war in California? And you think that&#8217;s going to solve your problems and get you more water? This is really, really terrible public policy.&#8221;</p>
<p>The proposed policy at issue is the San Joaquin Valley Water Reliability Act (HR 1837), sponsored by Republican Devin Nunes of Fresno.</p>
<p>Environmentalists say the bill (HR 1837) would gut <a title="EDF - water" href="http://www.edf.org/page.cfm?tagID=47306">efforts to restore the Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers</a>. Nunes says it&#8217;s essential to save farms and jobs.</p>
<p>&#8220;You only have a war from one side, and that&#8217;s from the radical environmental groups that are massacring the people who live in our communities.&#8221;</p>
<p>During the hearing, Republicans referred to &#8220;massive unemployment&#8221; in the Central Valley, that they say is linked to lower deliveries from state and federal water projects in recent years. The GOP-controlled subcommittee&#8217;s website includes a <a title="HR subcmte - issue" href="http://naturalresources.house.gov/Issues/Issue/?IssueID=5921">backgrounder</a> entitled  &#8220;The Man-made California Drought,&#8221; a catch phrase that refers  to how environmental regulations have squeezed water deliveries to  Valley farms. But environmental groups have cited studies from UC Davis and the University of the Pacific in Stockton that refute the economic damage.</p>
<p>Nunes singled out the threatened Delta smelt for special contempt. He showed photos of smelt on the menu at a Chicago tavern, saying that elsewhere, &#8220;smelt are for eating. In California, smelt are for saving.&#8221; At one point he threatened the federal Bureau of Reclamation with budget cuts if its staff &#8220;has time to run around saving fish.&#8221;</p>
<p>Opponents claim that the bill, even if passed piecemeal, would unravel current planning at the state level to attain &#8220;co-equal goals&#8221; of a reliable water supply and a sustainable ecosystem in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. Garamendi said, &#8220;I hear my colleagues talk about states rights <em>ad nauseam</em> and yet in this  legislation you are taking away the ability of the state of California to regulate its  own water.&#8221;</p>
<p>California Natural Resources chief John Laird testified that the Nunes bill would &#8220;overturn 100 years of water law.&#8221; Other members of the panel expressed concerns that if passed, the bill could set a <a title="NRDC - blog" href="http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/dobegi/hr_1837_preempting_state_water.html">precedent for federal preemption</a> of water regulation across the West. Nunes admits that the bill&#8217;s language can be improved. Democrats have called for another hearing on the bill.</p>
<p><a title="HR subcmte - issue" href="http://naturalresources.house.gov/Issues/Issue/?IssueID=5921"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2011/06/02/new-battlefront-over-california-water/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/files/2011/06/img5001p11a_UC_sm.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Farmers describe irrigation costs, benefits …: Labor costs may offset water savings of sprinkler systems</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
