<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:ymaps="http://api.maps.yahoo.com/Maps/V2/AnnotatedMaps.xsd" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Governor Rejects LAO Jobs Report on AB-32</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2010/03/09/governor-rejects-lao-jobs-report-on-ab-32/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2010/03/09/governor-rejects-lao-jobs-report-on-ab-32/</link>
	<description>KQED&#039;s multimedia series providing in-depth coverage of climate-related science and policy issues from a California perspective.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:35:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Greentech Voter Guide to the CA Governor Race</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2010/03/09/governor-rejects-lao-jobs-report-on-ab-32/comment-page-1/#comment-2955</link>
		<dc:creator>The Greentech Voter Guide to the CA Governor Race</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 06:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/?p=4978#comment-2955</guid>
		<description>[...] performed last year predicted that the law could create 120,000 new jobs, but the state&#8217;s Legislative Analyst&#8217;s Office said in March that those predictions couldn&#8217;t be backed up by the study&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] performed last year predicted that the law could create 120,000 new jobs, but the state&#8217;s Legislative Analyst&#8217;s Office said in March that those predictions couldn&#8217;t be backed up by the study&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

