Committee: No Free Lunch for Carbon Emitters

California’s cap-and-trade program took another baby step toward fruition on Monday, with the release of the state-appointed Economic and Allocation Advisory Committee’s final report on implementing carbon regulation.

Stopping just short of recommending a 100% auction of emission credits, the report, which is non-binding and was written to help the California Air Resources Board develop an economically sound cap-and-trade program, advises the state to sell off the majority of its carbon permits to emitters — with a few exceptions. Industries that “rely heavily” on carbon-based energy or compete directly with firms that do not face carbon regulation, the report says, should be “provided with assistance” or given funds earned from the auction.

The report pointedly advises against handing out free permits to utilities. Although the state’s utilities will almost certainly pass increased costs onto customers, the committee predicts that the price spike will provide an incentive for Californians to start saving energy. The committee’s press release says the report takes a “household friendly” approach to cap-and-trade, recommending that at least 75% of the proceeds from selling carbon permits be returned to households through either tax cuts or direct financial transfers.

Even before the report was released on Monday, the looming possibility of a carbon permit auction was causing anxiety in industrial circles. The AB-32 Implementation Group, an organization that aims to protect California business interests, claimed last week that if the price of carbon is set to $60 per ton, “large employers could be subject to an ‘Auction Tax’ of up to $143 billion by 2020.” Environmental groups have been urging the Air Board to auction off all the carbon permits initially offered.

In a written statement, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger responded to the committee’s report, saying “the best program will be one that returns value to the people through tax cuts, rebates or dividends, and I applaud the Committee for recognizing those options.”

Here’s a quick run down of the rest of the report’s key recommendations:

Protect Low Income Households

The report recommends returning some of the auction’s profits to low income households, since such households tend to spend a greater percentage of their income on energy.

Invest in a Low Carbon Economy

The committee recommends that the state create an independent Investment Advisory Board to help make it reach its low carbon targets.

Simple Auctions

The state’s carbon permit auctions should simple and allow the public to sell permits in the auctions along with the state.

  • Steve Bloom

    This is encouraging. Hopefully it will set agood precedent for the federal program.

  • Russ Steele

    My first question is how will California avoid this:

    “Last month, the European police agency Europol reported that the European Union’s Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS) had fallen victim to fraudulent trading activities over the past 18 months, worth €5 billion for several national tax revenues.
    It estimates that in some countries, up to 90% of the whole market volume was caused by fraudulent activities.”
    My second question is how can California sell carbon at $60.00 per ton, when it is trading at 10 cents a ton on the Chicago Carbon Exchange? Does this make good economic sense?

  • Dixon Cruickshank

    Yes Steve it will show how utterly absurd the whole folly is – they will exempt everybody but the utilities and just jack up electric rates, then skim a bunch off the top and give some back – sweet

  • James Mayeau

    Chiefio is taking a closer look at the NOAA / NCDC GHCN “raw” data for Central Park.
    NOAA is presenting data as “raw” (ie: unadjusted) that when compared against the actual raw data as collected by the National Weather Service in New York (here) is shown to be subjected to uncommented, undocumented, clandestine, adjustments which subtract as much as three degrees from turn of the century temperature data, thus creating an artificial century long “global warming” signature.

    This is nothing but pure fraud. Every step the CARB makes, no matter how tiny, is a major step backward for the people of California.

    The sooner Mary Nichols, and the entire global warming team are sacked, the agency defunded, and the offices shuttered, the better off we will all be.