<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Check, Please! Bay Area: Episode 6 (#106)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.kqed.org/checkplease/2006/01/19/check-please-bay-area-episode-6-106/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.kqed.org/checkplease/2006/01/19/check-please-bay-area-episode-6-106/</link>
	<description>regular people review Bay Area restaurants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 22:31:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sergé</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kqed.org/checkplease/2006/01/19/check-please-bay-area-episode-6-106/comment-page-1/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>Sergé</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2006 22:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mail1.kqed.org/wpmu/food/2006/01/19/check-please-bay-area-episode-6-106/#comment-174</guid>
		<description>There have been some good reviewers on Check Please!, and everyone has had something interesting to add.

I must say, though, that Jeannine&#039;s reviews are fantastic.  Future reviewers should read her writing and pick up on what makes for a good review:  Descriptions of an environment that include all the senses, comparisons that put a flavor or texture in a context familiar to a diner, and a seemingy agendaless and careful deconstruction of a meal.  Some of the &quot;Characters&quot; probably make for good television, but Jeannine and reviewers who approach her level of ability provide the backbone for the show&#039;s utility.  Thank you, Jeannine, and good job on the selection, Leslie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There have been some good reviewers on Check Please!, and everyone has had something interesting to add.</p>
<p>I must say, though, that Jeannine's reviews are fantastic.  Future reviewers should read her writing and pick up on what makes for a good review:  Descriptions of an environment that include all the senses, comparisons that put a flavor or texture in a context familiar to a diner, and a seemingy agendaless and careful deconstruction of a meal.  Some of the "Characters" probably make for good television, but Jeannine and reviewers who approach her level of ability provide the backbone for the show's utility.  Thank you, Jeannine, and good job on the selection, Leslie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

