More Budget Bits...

Comments (3)

Now that Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger's new budget proposal has had a day to marinate, let's take a look at a few small, but noteworthy items and themes found among the many micro-facts.

Next Time, Just Give Us The Cash: The governor's budget includes a $68.2 million reimbursement to the counties for conducting last May's special election, an election he and legislators called in hopes voters would ratify a package of budget related proposals. As we know, the voters said no to five of the six proposals.

So, in the order they appeared on the ballot, the cost to taxpayers for each doomed 'yes' vote was: Proposition 1A (budget reserve & tax hike) -- $40.88; Proposition 1B (education supplemental money) -- $37.18; Proposition 1C (lottery securitization) -- $39.91; Proposition 1D (tobacco tax shift) -- $41.76; and Proposition 1E (mental health funding shift) -- $42.68. (And remember, that's just taxpayer dollars; if you factored in all of the political campaign cash spent, it would be much higher.)

Budget Retreads: The new budget proposal is full of ideas that are not so new. First up, 2009's Prop 1D and Prop 1E mentioned above are back, with Schwarzenegger again counting as a budget solution the shift of a total of $1 billion into the general fund and out of programs earmarked by voters. The governor is assuming they'd be placed on the June statewide ballot. Also back from the dead: reductions in the number of Californians eligible for In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS), as well as elimination of more optional Medi-Cal benefits for adults, and a 4.8% surcharge (tax?) on property insurance to pay for firefighting. Each was rejected by the Legislature in 2009. All of these retreads beg the question: what's the governor know that no one else knows, making it reasonable to assume these will pass Capitol muster? So far, no one has a good answer.

Would You Rather..? The budget is chock full of items that have, even in the first few hours, been called clever, cynical, or both. These are cases where the governor and his budget team have tied together items that have no discernible nexus, and are destined to leave legislators (especially Democrats) wringing their hands about choices that they see as lose-lose.

It began on Wednesday, when Schwarzenegger announced plans for a constitutional amendment to link funding for prisons with spending on the University of California and California State University. Does that mean future debates about scarce budget resources would pit prison correctional officers against college students? On Friday, we got a few more. Tops on the list: funding state parks with a controversial new offshore oil drilling proposal, a $197 million dollar linkage pitting enviros against... themselves? Or how about the big gas tax move pitting drivers against public transportation users; drivers would supposedly get lower gas prices... but only if all current general fund methods of funding public transit are scrapped.

For Your (Re)Consideration, Feds: Schwarzenegger is again asking the federal government to do what it's supposed to do in paying for the cost of incarcerating undocumented immigrants. The program is the State Criminal Alien Assistance Program (SCAAP), and its been the bane of governors long before Schwarzenegger arrived on the scene. What's unusual this time, though, is that the governor's budget actually relies on the money being delivered... even though U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein said the Guv's demand for almost $880 million would amount to 92% of all SCAAP funds going to the states.

About That Magic Billion Bucks: A great symbol of the gimmickry agreed to in 2009 to balance the books was the magic $1 billion savings, achieved by pushing a state worker paycheck from June 30 of this year to July 1 -- thus moving the cost of those salaries into the 2010-11 fiscal year and, voila, saving the state money this year. Turns out the dollar amount is now being scored as $938 million, and the new Schwarzenegger budget plan now has to account for those paychecks as an extra cost. The really amazing thing about this gimmick is that while the "savings" was realized only once, the one day shift is now slated to happen every single year from here on out.

RSS Subscribe

About John Myers

John Myers is senior editor of KQED's new multimedia California Politics & Government Desk.  He has covered California politics for most of the past two decades -- serving previously as Sacramento bureau chief for KQED News and, most recently, as political editor for KXTV News10 (ABC) in Sacramento. He moderated the only gubernatorial debate of 2014, and was named one of the nation's top statehouse reporters by The Washington Post. Follow him on Twitter @johnmyers.
  • Henry22

    But wait it gets better, today the Governator went to the White House to ask for a bailout I can’t figure out where he thinks this money is going to come from?? The White House is tapped out, how about some smarter bond measures??

  • ps3 gamepad

    Democrats are expected to make a play for tax hikes, Republicans can be counted on to push back. Both fear voter revolt in an election year, creating the likelihood of political stalemate and yet another drawn-out budget tug-of-war.

  • Let It Bleed

    Henry 22 asks where the money will come from? Let me suggest a one day hiatus in the Iran and Afghanistan wars.